believers of theology often break the very rules of the belief.
The bending of rules is what alienates believers from just being honest.
For example: existence says (per bible) that man was born in the garden (nature) but then many believe existence was mad at man and kicked him out of the garden, but that isn't correct per genesis 3 as existence was sharing as if proud.
And in reality, as much as we all wish to think we are separate from nature, we all know we can never leave nature.
My point here, if is mother nature is existence himself, then she was our creator, our beginning and ending and our life's blood all in one.
As then we can see, that for mankind to 'believe' they are separat from the garden, then by choice, them folk have isolated themselves from existence.
That is how and why i believe the believers break the rules of theology by even considering themselve ever separate from existence; some are in the belief, existence is on a thrown (how far it's thrown, i don't presently aware.), which not only is impossible to prove, but incurs the amercanidol mentality and isolation from direct responsibility.
But to know existence is, all that exists (all of existence/nature), then not only is mankind describing him (with words/math) but also capable of experiencing him, teaching about him, and conveying knowledge to the next generations to honor him.
The biggest difference, is that a existence on a thrown (out of the ballpark), and a existence as all that is, are like having an idol to worship or being capable of appreciating just being alive. If each person knew that every step you take and every action you impose to exist, by choice, was right on existence's back, in his life, in his world; then responsibility would begin to be known by each person alive and conscious.
So there is much to know about existence, the issue is, is your existence on a thrown(in other word, overhandednesses or innerhandednessses?) or do you appreciate life and thankful for every breath you take?
