So what knocked the light poles over?
9/11 was an inside job
- Thread starter WINSTON
- Start date
- Status
My apologies: in my haste, I did not respond to you in full. I did both you and this discussion a disservice in not following up completely. Mea culpa.
Here are the points in my last post that were not responded to. I must insist on some kind of trea
1. Did cameras around the Pentagon have the right angle to see the airplane crash into the Pentagon? What was their shutter speed relative to the terminal velocity of the aircraft? Would they even be able to catch it?
2. There was nothing on your clip about controllability of the airplane at low altitudes and high speeds. Why not?
3. Why is the direction that the officers are walking suspect?
4. Why did you include an image of the railing? What is it meant to demonstrate?
5. Your last image is too far to the right and not on the correct angle of attack. Why was this picture selected?
6. How do you explain the existence of the wheel stub - and other aircraft parts - in the wreckage at the Pentagon? Do you have any evidence for this? How many people would be required to carry out the deceptions you suggest are occurring?
Thankyou for your perspicacity.
Soooooo.....they planted them? The drove a truck up and started dumping bend poles on the ground in broad daylight and absolutely NO ONE reported seeing this? What happened to the passengers and crew?
"Every action there is an equal and opposite reaction"
The plane hits with a force. An EQUAL force is projected back in the opposite direction.
Where is it?
You actually expect an airframe to withstand impact at nearly full throttle with a reinforced building?
This video shows a Mig-29 nose into the ground from an altitude of about 200 feet once, on almost no power. It folded up like an accordion, almost completely pancaked. There's chunks of engine there, and that's about it. How you expect a cheap-ass airframe like a 767 to still exist at such an impact boggles me. Should it be sticking out of the Pentagon like an arrow?
And what was originally at where you say the hole is will be blown 'out' in the direction of travel of the aircraft.
And makes a hole larger than the object hitting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3veYeFF28yo
But not in this case it seems.
Windows above the hole unbroken.
Which they certainly would not be, if instead the Pentagon were hit by a fucking missile. Because missiles are notoriously surgical when they just blow the hell up.
Which means it was neither.
Then again
Here's Slobodan Milosevic's residence in Belgrade after a Tomahawk cruise missile had hit it.
What happened to the passengers and crew of flight 77?
What kind of plane since American Airlines Flight 77 never took off on September 11th 2001?
Here's my evidence that there was no plane.
It ain't F____IN there.
I'm sorry, but that's not acceptable. You've already admitted to aircraft parts being scattered about in front of the Pentagon. There are elements of debris inside the building. I don't think the Pentagon generally stores such parts on site. That part of the argument appears to be done. Your remaining argument is whether they were planted or not. This would require an enormous conspiracy.
It ain't F___IN there.
The emperor is naked he doesn't have a magic suit. DOUBLETHINK
I know you'd LIKE it to be there but it ain't there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTTsyYXhd4Y
Not at all. An airframe crumples. A missile explodes. Intact windows means that it was not a missile; your picture of Milosevic's damaged palace - the result of a Tomahawk hit - shows broken windows adjacent to the impact site. This is evidence against the Pentagon strike being from a missile. I might add that in some of the videos I can see a massive vehicle 'en route' to the impact site, far too large and bulky to be a Tomahawk. We can examine that, if you like.
This is not an acceptable response. Would you like to discontinue this discussion?
roscoe
Notice the LACK of intact windows. So we now have evidence that no explosion occurred inside the Pentagon, just like we've been saying all along. Thanks.
Not in the picture, the plane was mostly inside the building and that is not an Xray photo. The wings disintegrated into pieces as small as a note pad, with some hard parts(engines and main landing gear, mostly)scattered on the ground outside. The nose gear(and it's identifying serial number) was found near the back wall of ring 1C. The DNA was everywhere in small chunks of body parts. That airplane hit that building and nothing you have posted has raised the least doubt of that reality. Until you start dealing with reality you are delusional, at best.
Grumpy
Notice the LACK of intact windows. So we now have evidence that no explosion occurred inside the Pentagon, just like we've been saying all along. Thanks.
Not in the picture, the plane was mostly inside the building and that is not an Xray photo. The wings disintegrated into pieces as small as a note pad, with some hard parts(engines and main landing gear, mostly)scattered on the ground outside. The nose gear(and it's identifying serial number) was found near the back wall of ring 1C. The DNA was everywhere in small chunks of body parts. That airplane hit that building and nothing you have posted has raised the least doubt of that reality. Until you start dealing with reality you are delusional, at best.
Grumpy
Ever hear of the Bermuda Triangle, denialist?
Shut up you prat.
roscoe
Notice the LACK of intact windows. So we now have evidence that no explosion occurred inside the Pentagon, just like we've been saying all along. Thanks.
Not in the picture, the plane was mostly inside the building and that is not an Xray photo. The wings disintegrated into pieces as small as a note pad, with some hard parts(engines and main landing gear, mostly)scattered on the ground outside. The nose gear(and it's identifying serial number) was found near the back wall of ring 1C. The DNA was everywhere in small chunks of body parts. That airplane hit that building and nothing you have posted has raised the least doubt of that reality. Until you start dealing with reality you are delusional, at best.
Grumpy
No
You've been told it is inside. Then again you were told there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Ah The DNA!!!!
Read This - Show me the Arabs
Nothing I write makes you happy. Make a list of the conspiracies that are acceptable to you and I'll sign right on. I'm only trying to help.
You've been told it wasn't there.
Good Luck
I've been mixing it with you BCTs since January 2002.
I've already heard EVERY argument.
- Status