Ganymede
Valued Senior Member
If there was molten metal twelve weeks later, and I doubt that, a short explosive device would not be the cause. Thermite burns quickly and would not cause that either. So once again, what is your point here?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no wonder I have you on ignore.
No. Glowing metal is not the same as molten steel. You need to produce some evidence of molten steel.
I've already provided the evidence. The ability to read is a virtue.
Aluminum will melt at a far lower temperature than steel. Can you show evidence that it was steel and not aluminum?
I already did.
The eyewitness reports are of hearing explosions which is no surprise at all. It is dishonest to try and pass that off as evidence for bombs.
The claims of thermite, which does not explode, come from a man who is basically a running joke. His main area of work is not structural engineering or metals it is in cold fusion. He was too scared to publish his work in a relevant peer reviewed journal. I wonder why…
He has more credentials then you ever will.
[qoute]Stop for a second and think about your rationalizing there. You have a building loaded with invisible bombs and massive amounts of thermite (which no one saw) and they are going to fly planes into it. Why fly planes into it? Lack of evidence aside, the conspiracy theories make no sense.[/quote]
No one saw the 757 hit the Pentagon either. Do you have any visual evidence? Yes or No?
The pancaking caused the collapse and it started at the top of the building. If there were bombs in the basement they didn't do anything.
If there was bombs in the basement then it assisted in weakening the buildings foundation.
Due to my argumentative nature I tend to get involved in these discussions. There isn’t much for me to add here though as Kenny has been taking your posts apart.
Kenny hasn't done shit but post inconclusive videos, nameless sources. He's the worst debater I've faced yet next to you.