that would be cool!
read only, just because they are cross breed doesnt mean they are infertile and seed cant be reused where as delibretly breeding infertile crops and then saying "we are giving these to you to help you out, arnt we great" IS unethical
i will respond to this tomorow, want to check it out. If im wrong i will apoligise but im sure that wheat farmers DONT buy seed every year. what would be the point, if enough seed was grown to produce that many plants every year then why not just sell it to the supermarkets
An Australian Anarchist Weblog is proudly powered by WordPress said:The FAO estimated in 2002 that 97% of Iraqi farmers used their own saved seed or bought seed from local markets. Their main crops are wheat, barley, date and pulses which is a big part of their diet and very much at the base of their food network. But under the new regime, states the report, “farmers can neither freely legally plant nor save for re-planting seeds of any “protected ” plant variety” that enters the country. The rights of corporate plant breeders, (seed corporations who develop seed using genetic engeneering, who own the seed, all or part of their gene sequences, lease genes and seeds as a software, and shamelessly harvest royalties worldwide), extend to harvested material, including plants product obtained from the protected variety. For instance, if the protected variety is a type of wheat, a registered cultivar, that requires less kneading as flour to make bread, then the seed company could claim rights over the final product, in this case it could be a “copyrighted” french stick, brioche, croissant, or pizza base.
Viewed 02:30 on 26\01\08
Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation said:c) make sure the seed you keep for planting the next year is of the highest quality. Good quality seed sets up good crops.
Viewed 02:30 on 26\01\08
Seeds to Feed the World said:Oh, the seed company would want to do it because in essence it would cut down their production costs quite a bit. I mean, seed companies don't make a lot of money making seeds, the margins are very, very, very slim, so if they could be able to make a plant which was engineered to make its own seeds generation, after generation, after generation, the seed production company would only have to make the hybrids once and it would be fixed forever. So it would benefit them in terms of lower production costs but it will also benefit people in the developing world because they'd be able to get these hybrid seeds, they'd be able to plant them and then they'd be able to make hybrids generation, after generation, after generation. So the seed companies then could turn to the business of making more and more hybrids, better and better and better, which they've been doing for the last 75 years. And the farmer wants the best seed, I mean sure, they want to plant them back and get the best crop but if the seed company comes up with something that gives the farmer you know 30% increase in yield, 40% increase in yield, 50% increase in yield, the farmer is going to want to buy those seeds, even if it's only once and then plant them back every single generation, they're going to want the best technology. I mean, farmers always want the best technology and actually they're going to recoup most of the profits rather than the seed company, because they're going to get and realise the increase in yield.
Viewed 02:30 on 26\01\08
Landline said:A profit-making company is telling farmers they can't do what they have been doing for generations.
That is, save seeds from their crops to plant out the following year.
Reporter Prue Adams asked: "So it's quite common for you to keep your seed?"
"Yes ma'am, I've done it for years ever since I took over my daddy's part," Mr Ralph said.
Viewed 02:30 on 26\01\08
Ah found it. Now this first quote is from a blog so i cant be sure of its reliability
Its a blog talking about Iraq
The next ones should be much more reliable
This one is from an organisation associated with the federal goverment
And this one is from the ABC Radio national and does seem to surport you though its about them trying to fix the problem
This is from landline another ABC program
It seems to me we are both right, some farmers do and some dont.
i said i would try. Its not exactly the easiest thing to google search which is all i can do untill i can get to a libary. But i am starting to think your right, that hybrids are sold year to year where as normal crops are kept. I will keep looking but unless i find something else i am willing to concide the point. I wont concide that people dont keep seed aside each year from there previous crops to grow next year though but it could be unhybridised crops
fair enough
Im big enough to admit im wrong
did you ever look at that thread on the girl who's blood changed in Bio and Genetics?