scott3x said:I think he's a fairly intelligent man but if you're not someone who knows much about engineering, you can easily be fooled into believing the official story.
We are dealing with at least 3 different factors, intelligence, knowledge and emotional blocks. Emotional blocks can interfere with intelligence. It is rarely easy to tell what it is.
But the JREFers claiming my post was off topic was outside the box. There wasn't any basis for that. I was just being a little sarcastic in the joke. But why start another thread with it. I don't know if it was a different moderator that closed the thread or not. I just figured somebody would razz me about the sarcasm. I never conceived of that reaction. That entire incident goes in my stupid column.
I asked Tricky to delete my previous suggested books. He hasn't responded.
But there is the problem of people who actually come across as intelligent enough to easily understand why the planes could not do it but argue that they did anyway. That is how R. Mackey comes across to me and most of the time I get that impression with econ41 also. It is often like they are helping the not so smart BELIEVERS to believe what they prefer.
psik
Some people are clearly in on the deception. We can speculate on who is and who isn't but I personally find it's not really worth my time at present. The line between someone who's trying to deceive and someone who's angry that you would challenge their belief in the deception blurs in my view. I guess in the ending all you can do is keep on trying to show potential disbelievers the truth. Some people do eventually become persuaded. The other day, Headspin showed me a video of Plato's cave. The details may not apply in this case, but I definitely liked the concept...