Dilbert,
Very few people have ever inspired me to want to reach through this screen and throttle them. You, Dilbert, have succeeded in this. Your statements are assinine at best.
actually all animals on this planet have the same brain more or less.
Oh? All animals? Really? Where the fuck did you get that? You're saying that a rat's brain is the same as an elephant's brain except for size and a few minor differences? How about the fact that you can remove a rat's cortex and the rat will still function in a mostly ratlike manner? You're saying that a dog brain with HUGE olfactory bulbs is the same as a rabbit brain? You're saying that a reptile's brain is the same as a mammal's brain?
Brains are
similar but saying that they are the same is a gross generalization.
All animals have the same "standard" values. For most animals these only feature basic reflexes, such as survival instincts.
Oh? The same standard 'values' eh? I'll agree that the very basic instincts are shared but do you think that a predator's system of 'values' is the same as a prey animal's?
Another gross generalization.
Humans on the other hand have come a long way, but back on the stone age we were not as "civil" as we are today. Not sure if you can call it civil (just look at the world today), but we at least believe that we are more civil.
A stone-age man is really stupid in today's eyes. What created "today's eyes" was evolution. Evolution took time, a very long time.
Oh? A long way, huh? You're saying that we're more evolved than other animals?
The point has already been made that the brain from a stone age man is the same as a modern human. Evolution led to the brain. Since that time evolution hasn't had much of a chance to do anything. One reason for this is that the stone age was
yesterday evolutionarily speaking.
Was your point about "all animals having the same brain more or less" supposed to say something about the differences between stone age man and modern man? If so, then it's an even more idiotic comment. Homo sapiens in the stone age had the exact same brain as we modern humans have. Take a stone age baby and raise it in the modern era and
you wouldn't know the difference.
Anyway, all this has
nothing to do with a pile of neurons in a petri dish, does it?
The neurons as we are talking about in this thread are not a human brain. They are simply a few neurons forming a connection. This connection is the neural net.
No shit??!! Wow. I bet you you just amazed everyone here. We know it's a fucking neural net. And we know it's not a human brain. It'd be pretty tough for a few rat neurons to even try to make a human brain. I almost expected you to break out some terminater lingo. "It's a neural net processor. A learning computer." **Best Schwarzenegger imitation.**
So, why do you believe that this particular neural net, that is way, way inferior to human brains will arise from the ashes in a matter of seconds and become the smartest creation on this planet and decide to kill every man? That is probably the most preposterous nonsense that i have heard.
Now, this... THIS... is what really fucking irked me. Above and beyond all the other nonsense. This statement shows the depth of your idiocy.
You know what's even more preposterous than this nonsense "that you've heard"? You're the only one to bring up "killer" cyborgs. How fucking preposterous that you bring up a concept as if others here are saying it and have the fucking gall to pretend that you're outraged by 'hearing it."
AI is supposed to be a science. But your hopes and endless glorification of the small advances is turning it more into a religion. You might want to consider starting a cult.
And another idiotic statement from left field. Who's starting a fucking cult? I'll join it if we can lay you out on the altar and cut your fucking heart out.