It is curious that most people don't have any need to doubt things. The Twin Towers were more than twice as tall as WTC7. Was the steel distribution down the bottom half of the North Tower the same as WTC7 or its own top half.
So I decided not to discuss WTC7 and focus on the Twin Towers. More on the North because as soon as I mention the center of gravity of the tilted top of the South, which the NCSTAR1 report admits was "20 to 25 degrees" suddenly no one has anything to say. Do people on science forums know what a center of gravity is?
I searched NCSTAR1 for "center of gravity" and "center of mass", both terms are in the report. Whenever center of mass is used it is about the aircraft. Whenever center of gravity is used it is about some simulated structural component like a beam or a perimeter panel.
Who cares about a tilted mass that may have weighed more that 100,000 tons about 900 ft up? Does anyplace even give a number for that weight?
So I decided not to discuss WTC7 and focus on the Twin Towers. More on the North because as soon as I mention the center of gravity of the tilted top of the South, which the NCSTAR1 report admits was "20 to 25 degrees" suddenly no one has anything to say. Do people on science forums know what a center of gravity is?
I searched NCSTAR1 for "center of gravity" and "center of mass", both terms are in the report. Whenever center of mass is used it is about the aircraft. Whenever center of gravity is used it is about some simulated structural component like a beam or a perimeter panel.
Who cares about a tilted mass that may have weighed more that 100,000 tons about 900 ft up? Does anyplace even give a number for that weight?