Before Flynn worked for Trump, he worked for Obama. The question becomes when did Flynn begin his Russian connection, if there was one? The left works under the premise that he never spoke to the Russians, until he met Trump.
As you were previously instructed, Flynn was a career Army officer who began his service under the Reagan administration. When Flynn began his Russian connection isn’t relevant here. The fact is he had one, and it first surfaced after he had been dismissed by the Obama administration.
Where is your evidence the “left works under the premise that he never spoke to Russians, until he met Trump”? As previously pointed out, it isn’t relevant for all the previously given reasons.
Obama fired Flynn for calling him spineless in terms of dealing with the threats to the US. The soft handed of Obama approach benefited the Russians, since it did not push back against many of their hostile actions. Flynn did not give the Russians uranium. He was against this. Flynn is a scapegoat to cover up the Russian connection of the Democratic party. Flynn was a highly ranked intelligence officer during Obama, who knew their policies. He had to be discredited, so he would not talk about these Russian dealings.
Except, that’s not true either, Flynn was fired because he attempted to politicalize military intelligence just as did when he served as the national intelligence officer in the Trump administration. He began with the conclusion and then looked for the evidence to support his conclusion. That’s not how intelligence is supposed to work. Ask Bush 2.o how well that worked out for him.
No matter how many times you repeat your falsehood, it won’t make it any less false.
Let me pose this question. If the Russians had the influence to destabilize the US, what would they like to see happen? Would they be happy with the way the US government is being destabilized, with misinformation, by their Democrat party comrades?
Well, Russians are did influence the US election and they are very happy. When Trump’s victory was announced Russian government officials celebrated.
As you were previously instructed, Democrats aren’t destabilizing the US government Trump is doing that all on his own. That’s why Russia supported The Donald. That’s why Russia intervened in our election in order to get him elected.
Democrats are doing what they should be doing. They are standing up for American values, and rightfully so. Exercising their rights and duties doesn’t destabilize the country comrade. And you and your Republican cohorts should be ashamed for saying otherwise.
Alienating our allies as Trump did last week destabilizes our country. Trump’s pathological lying destroys his credibility and the credibility of the nation. That destabilizes our country comrade. Trump’s inability to lead destabilizes the country. Trump’s ignorance and narcissism destabilizes the country. Trump’s incompetence destabilizes our country, and people like you who put him in office destabilize our country.
One needs to look at history. The Democrats like socialism and even communism. They also have a soft spot for dictators. They have more in common with Russia. They are not into capitalism and smaller government, just like Russia.
Democrats like what works for the American people. They like capitalism, but they aren’t ideologically ill disposed to some socialistic programs like Social Security, and Medicare when they make sense. Republicans like those programs too. But they don’t want to acknowledge it or they remain ignorant of the fact that their socialistic government programs are socialistic in nature.
Again Wellwisher, just where is your evidence Democrats like dictators? You have none, because none exists. Democrats believe in and actively propagate democratic values and human rights. That puts them at odds with the dictators The Donald so loves, e.g. Putin. That’s why those dictators favored Trump. That’s why one of those dictators intervened in our election in order to get Trump elected.
What I would do is continue investigating the allegations against Trump for the rest of the year. If there is still no smoking gun, then the accusers from the left should investigated, since they appear to be helping the Russians create chaos icing KGB misinformation tactic. The left is not even thinking of solutions to problems but simply setting up chaos in the government. It quacks like a duck.
Yeah, you have already said so. Why do you feel it necessary to repeat yourself? As you have been repeatedly told, it took more than 2 years to find Nixon’s smoking gun. It took a year and a half to clear Clinton of your baseless email allegations. You folks investigated Clinton for almost 30 years and found nothing. You folks investigated White Water for nearly 8 years and found no there, there, and you only want to investigate your man The Donald for a year? Truth be told, you don’t want him investigated at all. Tough, you need to man up.
I tell you what, you investigate all the people who falsely accused Hillary of wrong doing over the course of the last nearly 30 years first, and then you can investigate all of Trump’s accusers. Do we have a deal?
Unlike all the Republican partisan investigations of Hillary, Trump and his associates are being investigated not because someone has accused them of wrong doing, but because of the evidence. There is overwhelming evidence here of suspicious activity. We do know Russia actively intervened in our election to help Trump. We know Trump’s campaign officials had illicit contacts with Russian intelligence and banking officers both during and after the election. We know Trump’s associates lied about their Russian contacts and tried to conceal them. We know Trump called upon Russia to help him by releasing Hillary's emails. We know Trump has and continues to advocate some very Russia friendly policies. We also know Trump has been the least transparent POTUS since Nixon. We also know Trump’s business dealings provide ample opportunity for miscreant behaviors. We know of at least one and possibly more Trump financial deals which give the appearance of Russian money laundering.
