Gee, your right. That atheist named Stalin really didn't kill more people then Hitler. Boy - did you get uninteresting really quick!
Everybody is 'obsessed with themselves' to some degree. It's part of the human condition, part of being self-aware. No one has a lock on it, either theist or athiest. To the degree that they obsess on themselves, they exclude consideration for others. When I'm thinking about me, I'm not thinking about you.Originally posted by Zero
You might've heard this all too often, but judging that someone is obsessed with him/herself just because s/he is atheist is stupid.
Xev - if you claim to know a persons underlying motivations, you are claiming to know something at the heart of a person that cannot be determined but only guessed at. So if you could point out different motivations in one sentence, and then claim in the next sentence not to know or care, and then in the third sentance accuse me of attacking you, then I'm afraid I'm just going to have to hold onto my credit card and bank account numbers until we can come to a better understanding.Originally posted by Xev
I do not know. You claimed to know, I pointed out different motivations.
So, even though Stalin was head of an avowed athiestic state, current day athiests don't want to be associated with his actions? Fine. Then why do all us current day Christians have to take the heat for all the sociopathic, blood thirsty, power hungry nutjobs who used the Nazarene as cover for their antics? Maybe we can start over again. Hi, my name is Turduckin. What's yours?Originally posted by Xev
You don't hear about athiests spilling the oceans of blood that the vicious sheep of the Nazarene did, now do you?
Originally posted by Voodoo Child
The difference though, is that Stalin was a sociopathic, blood thirsty, power hungry nutjob who slaughtered to keep his grip on the USSR.
Xev - if you claim to know a persons underlying motivations, you are claiming to know something at the heart of a person that cannot be determined but only guessed at. So if you could point out different motivations in one sentence, and then claim in the next sentence not to know or care, and then in the third sentance accuse me of attacking you, then I'm afraid I'm just going to have to hold onto my credit card and bank account numbers until we can come to a better understanding.
So, even though Stalin was head of an avowed athiestic state, current day athiests don't want to be associated with his actions?
Fine. Then why do all us current day Christians have to take the heat for all the sociopathic, blood thirsty, power hungry nutjobs who used the Nazarene as cover for their antics?
PS: Xev - I was only counting 'non-comabatants' killed in prisons or death camps. Otherwise, your right.