Because they need something to belive in, they just can't believe in themselves. Nothing wrong with any belief as long as they don't make it a fact and keep fact and fiction seperate.
Just because we cannot see God through either a telescope or a microscope is no reason to assume that he does not exist.Why should people believe in God?
Just because we cannot see God through either a telescope or a microscope is no reason to assume that he does not exist.
Pascal's Wager (or Pascal's Gambit) is a suggestion posed by the French philosopher, mathematician and physicist Blaise Pascal that, even though the existence of God cannot be determined through reason, a person should wager as though God exists, because living life accordingly has everything to gain, and nothing to lose. Pascal formulated his suggestion uniquely on the God of Jesus Christ as implied by the greater context of his Pensées, a posthumously published collection of notes made by Pascal in his last years as he worked on a treatise on Christian apologetics. However, some argue that Pascal's Wager also applies to gods of other religions and belief systems.
In short being unconditioned is a prerequisite for getting free from conditioned life - not meeting that grade simply means one will be decked with any of the millions of life in the pursuit of (ephemeral) desireThis is not the thrust of the question.
Why good will it do me to search and find God?
What benefit is there for me in believing in God?
What will I really lose if I don't believe in God?
1. According to CS Lewis, you will find joy, unlike any other joy you've experienced before on this earth. Any happiness, any enjoyable sensation, they will all fail to match the joy from one's connection with God. It isn't easily attained, and it requires faith and acts to maintain, but it is well worth it.This is not the thrust of the question.
Why good will it do me to search and find God?
What benefit is there for me in believing in God?
What will I really lose if I don't believe in God?
Why should people believe in God?
I believe in God because the life, death and teaching of Jesus reflect the fact that everything we consider most precious on earth - truth, goodness, freedom, justice, beauty and love - converge in the reality of one loving Father in heaven. It's as simple as that! The alternative is a barren, empty, meaningless desert of futility...A similar question that I am intellectually engaged with is the -- 'why do people believe in God' question. There's no longer any suggestion that people are in any way obligated to believe in God. But the fact remains that throughout history most people have indeed believed in God, or in gods or spirits or heavenly powers of many sorts, and that's something that still needs to be explained.
There's no convincing reason that I know of why people should.
I don't feel any guilt over my own failure to believe, nor do I feel like I'm shirking my religious responsibilities or anything.
Of course, if I instead believed that God exists, then I'd probably respond that it's best to believe in important truths, especially ones that are as transcendentally important as God - when our very salvation depends on it. Or whatever it is that my tradition had taught me to think.
But I don't believe in God, so the 'why should' question is kind of a non-issue for me.
A similar question that I am intellectually engaged with is the -- 'why do people believe in God' question. There's no longer any suggestion that people are in any way obligated to believe in God. But the fact remains that throughout history most people have indeed believed in God, or in gods or spirits or heavenly powers of many sorts, and that's something that still needs to be explained.
That's why I'm interested in things like the emerging cognitive science of religion.
But I don't believe in God, so the 'why should' question is kind of a non-issue for me.
Why should people believe in God?
I believe in God because the life, death and teaching of Jesus reflect the fact that everything we consider most precious on earth - truth, goodness, freedom, justice, beauty and love - converge in the reality of one loving Father in heaven. It's as simple as that! The alternative is a barren, empty, meaningless desert of futility...
I believe in karma. I believe in good actions and good reactions. I believe a religion can be centered around a set of good ethics that are true and unchangable over time.
I believe there is good and bad in the world and most of it is bad. But there is good in the world too and it's admirable to follow that path.
And I believe there is a God behind it all.
It is possible to consider that we are working our way towards immortal thought- to transferring or creating immortal machines that are our higher functions that live on for million of years. In this case we're all the Play-Dough that will ultimately become a permanent sentient prescence in the universe.
What would be better than being able to live a billion or more years and travel the universe in your thought machine?
Of course we could possibly do all that anyway without supernatural help.
False dichotomy. Has a lot of assumptions, the main one being that the god is the christian one.
The Atheist's Wager is better, as it covers all bases, and only fails if you have a god that isn't benevolent, in which case you were probably in trouble anyway.
I don't think believing is a choice, but if one makes the choice, then
the reason becomes the individuals.