seagypsy,
Do you still have an ego problem?
If not, how did it get solved?
Either that, or they genuinely have no reason to believe that is the case.
There is no evidence for it, only cartoons, hearsay, and wishful thinking.
What would happen to us, at any point in our life, if we regarded the goo to man dogma as bullshit?
That depend on whose 6 day period you're referring to.
For example, Lord Brahma's day (the secondary creator of the universe according to vedic literatures), has been calculated to be the equivalent to 311 trillion of our years. And his nights are of the same length. At the end of every one of his nights, there is a partial annihilation of the universe, and comes back in the day.
So there are different perspectives of time.
I totally understand. It's like when you go for a job interview, if you can visualise the interviewer on the toilet with his pants round his ankles, with a face that says
this piece of pooh is a long time coming, but with a last push, I'm sure I can get at least half of it on it's way, then that may well give you the illusion of confidence. Well done for being so spontaneous.
This, of course is the biggy: deny, deny, deny, His existence. Why? Because one day you will come to believe it. Then you are free! Free I tell-ya.
You're free to let darwinism make a monkey out of you.
The only people who need goo to man stories to be true, are people who don't believe in God.
jan.
My response to the question is. I am an atheist these days but when I was a theist, I rejected evolution because I had an ego problem for one thing.
Do you still have an ego problem?
If not, how did it get solved?
I would tell atheists, "maybe YOU evolved from pond scum but I didn't".
To accept that human beings evolved from lesser creatures is to take us off of the superior creation pedestal.
Either that, or they genuinely have no reason to believe that is the case.
There is no evidence for it, only cartoons, hearsay, and wishful thinking.
What would happen to us, at any point in our life, if we regarded the goo to man dogma as bullshit?
The lengthy process of evolution also goes against the 6 day creation as stated in the bible.
That depend on whose 6 day period you're referring to.
For example, Lord Brahma's day (the secondary creator of the universe according to vedic literatures), has been calculated to be the equivalent to 311 trillion of our years. And his nights are of the same length. At the end of every one of his nights, there is a partial annihilation of the universe, and comes back in the day.
So there are different perspectives of time.
But in order to accept that as a possibility I had to accept that God is an idiot and doesn't think things through all the way and he is the shittiest designer ever.
I totally understand. It's like when you go for a job interview, if you can visualise the interviewer on the toilet with his pants round his ankles, with a face that says
this piece of pooh is a long time coming, but with a last push, I'm sure I can get at least half of it on it's way, then that may well give you the illusion of confidence. Well done for being so spontaneous.
And his employment of trial and error even though he supposedly knows everything shows that he is just a jerk. Obviously, that left me with a very bad taste in my mouth for god and i refused to accept that God would be such an ass. Instead i accepted that he is not an ass, he just does not exist.
This, of course is the biggy: deny, deny, deny, His existence. Why? Because one day you will come to believe it. Then you are free! Free I tell-ya.
You're free to let darwinism make a monkey out of you.
So I am guessing that many believers would see accepting theistical evolution as a slippery slope to atheism. And they simply don't want to go there.
The only people who need goo to man stories to be true, are people who don't believe in God.
jan.