because it's not true would be a perfectly valid reason.Because they don't want to. Their beliefs make them happy. Why give up something that makes you happy?
Agreed.And what place does religion even have on a science forum?
*************
M*W: I've been on sciforums for several years now, and no matter what you read, legitimately research, or post, the christians on this forum are not open to new or innovative ideas about their religion, and they only believe what has been fed to them by their leaders.
I'm sorry, but legitimate research does not include things impossible to verify.
That is a scary thought, if you ask me. I question why they don't even want to listen to what could be a possible revelation to them, but they shun all ideas of anything different than what they already know.
Here's a revelation, Gravity does not exist. No? You're sure you are right? Hope it's not a theory...
What's amusing is that some of the christians on board make broad statements that have long been found to be untrue. Some of these statements include:
Adam and Eve
Noah's Ark on Mount Ararat
The talking serpent
The plural gods of Eden
Giants of the Earth
All the metaphors for Jesus
Jesus's birth
Jesus's life
Jesus's death
Jesus's resurrection
All the witnesses who never saw Jesus
...and more.
What I want to know is when does truth and reality clash with lies and fantasy? And, why can't christians see the fallacies of their beliefs?
More to the point, why can't you see that the truth or falsehood of these things can only be accepted, not proven.
Christianity is not a forward moving religion. In fact, it seems from the posters here, it is going backwards to the days before scientific research existed or was kosher for it's believers to undertake such a feat.
Childish nonsense.
It just doesn't make sense to me that a scientific forum contains information from the Dark Ages. Surely the human race has progressed beyond that even where religion is concerned.
And yet, here it is.
A bigger concern I have is why are those people who are still living in the Dark Ages allowed to post their drivel in a modern scientific forum?
What I want to know is when does truth and reality clash with lies and fantasy? And, why can't christians see the fallacies of their beliefs?
Refuted and mocked
*************Hmmm. Posting that the various religions are actually "Sun Worship" is somehow better? If I attack your beliefs, do you mildly say, "To each his own"? Of course not. To theists, their deity/deities are as cherished as family, and sometimes the associated beliefs are thus as well. I'm sorry, is it harming you, personally?:bugeye::bugeye::bugeye:
*************
?
********No matter what they say MW... I admire your commitment and knowledge in this topic. It is obvious that Texas still got inteligent people.
It hasn't been refuted. For all practical purposes, the refutation of Christianity is wishful thinking at best.
Because they don't want to. Their beliefs make them happy. Why give up something that makes you happy?
It hasn't been refuted. For all practical purposes, the refutation of Christianity is wishful thinking at best.
Myself, I am no Christian nor do I support Christianity. Especially the mainstream fire and brimstone version of Christianity is impossible to refute, as its tenets are such that one would have to be at least enlightened to know that they are wrong.
For all practical purposes, Christianity can only be avoided, but not refuted.
One because they probably do not belive their religion has been refuted. Two, religion is not about fact but rather about faith. Three, religion has been a glue that has held mankind together throughout history. Granted their have been abuses, and those abuses have been throughly documented. But who really cares if Christians want to continue their belief system as long as they are not forcing others. I say let each to their own. If it gives them comfort and serves as a rule and guide for them...great, as long as they don't cross the line and start forcing people to conform to their viewpoints.
Not all Christians take that story literally.Adam and Eve
:bugeye:The plural gods of Eden
Very few take that bit literally.Noah's Ark on Mount Ararat
See above.The talking serpent
See above.Giants of the Earth
Be specific.All the metaphors for Jesus
Could be because it's core to their religion? Maybe?Jesus's birth
Which is attested to by Flavius Josephus. Not in much detail, but he does state that there was a preacher named Jesus(Yeshua), brother of a preacher named John(Yohannan), that had a following around Galilee and Jerusalem, and was executed.Jesus's life
As said above, something attested to by historical records.Jesus's death
Again, because it is core to their religion. It's not been proven, but it's not been disproven, hence it is taken on faith by them. It's part of their system of belief.Jesus's resurrection
Why can't you stop generalising hundreds of millions of people on the views of an, albeit vocal, minority?And, why can't christians see the fallacies of their beliefs?
Not all Christians take that story literally.
Very few take that bit literally.
See above.
See above.
Be specific.
Could be because it's core to their religion? Maybe?
Which is attested to by Flavius Josephus. Not in much detail, but he does state that there was a preacher named Jesus(Yeshua), brother of a preacher named John(Yohannan), that had a following around Galilee and Jerusalem, and was executed.
As said above, something attested to by historical records.
Again, because it is core to their religion. It's not been proven, but it's not been disproven, hence it is taken on faith by them. It's part of their system of belief.
Why can't you stop generalising hundreds of millions of people on the views of an, albeit vocal, minority?
I'm not a Christian, obviously, but I will stand up for them if they are being attacked for simply having a set of beliefs. It's fine to criticise the academic veracity of certain claims, but what you are doing (generalising Christians themselves) is unfair and childish.