When i asked why it was important to you. I was asking only about 1 Specific question you had. That was "Why did God create the angels first"
Why didn't you answer my Question? Why did you write all the above that has nothing to do with the question i asked You?
Extremely frustrating when you do your best to answer specific points and then the person totally ignores your specific question and goes off in a ramble that has nothing to do with the point of the question asked.
So again i will ask you a question.
Why is it important for you to know why God created Angels first?????
All Praise The Ancient Of Days
Ok.
I didn't ignore your response, Adstar, I in fact acknowledged that I would take some time in responding to everyone's post with your post in mind specifically. And when you DID quote me in your post, you quoted the ENTIRE introduction. So I was assuming, incorrectly it seems, that you were questioning "why is it important that I find the qualitative value in God". Thus I responded.
If you only meant to quote the question "why did god create angels before man" only quote that section please to help reduce confusion, and I will make an honest attempt to dissect the quoted sections more thoroughly. Moving on...
The answer to Why he created Angels before man is important to me for the simple reason that. If...
Then God said, 'Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.' " (Genesis 1:26)
Why didn't he create Angels to do so? Lucifer and friends were made capable of sinning, and man to follow? What's the point in having happy sinless angels if you want angels to sin?
If you DON'T want angels to sin, then why give them the capacity to do so?
If a plan was to create a race of beings who knew of God greatness, because he NEEDED them to, why not create NO angels that were capable of sinning, create man capable of sinning, man sins, one man becomes the ruler of the underworld by God's natural propensity for condemnation, and then go from there? What's the point in the angels doing the sinning first, and then create man to be punished and saved for it? Why not punish the angels and give them a chance for redemption and salvation? Why not send Jesus down from the throne to save all of Angel and demons from further sin, for they were BORN/CREATED in sin? Why the extra step?
They indeed did and do have free will. satan was an angel who demonstrated quite clearly he had and has free will.
Again, why create man to follow if Satan and the angels had the whole sinning thing down, and the potential to be saved by God's grace and their freedom of choice?
Maybe to demonstrate something important to the Angels.
Maybe? Why does the Perfect bible leave so much room for speculation? I don't like speculation on claimed factual events, I like definites, things that are verifiable.
When we start assuming things, and changing things around, we begin to erode any "perfection" involved with what it is we're speculating about. And surely I would assume a Perfect book would leave no room for speculation, wouldn't you?
If it SHOULD have speculation, then how are we to trust SOME parts, if we can speculate on others, how can one tell the difference if it's all from the same source?
Especially if I am told from one section of the perfect book to "trust in God to give you the answers" and in the other part to "stone my daughter if she does not remain celibate". The burden of proof is for God, Jesus, The Angels, Satan, the Apostles, and the architects of the Bible.
I am not claiming to know and tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God. They are! So why leave room for speculation? Just because there is speculation does not mean speculation is necessary for free will.
If someone tells me 2+2=5 is a fact, and I have free will, guess what... I have the freedom to tell them, no actually 2+2=4! That's what free will is all about. If I am given the facts about something, I can CHOOSE to disbelieve or believe it, just as I can choose to believe or disbelieve the "facts" in the bible, wouldn't you would agree?
So please adstar, don't say speculation is necessary to test our free will and faith in God, because the test doesn't work. What if I were to test my faith and stone my daughter, but NOT trust in God to give me the answer? How is this test any less valid?
Would I be ok in the Good Book? Or perhaps would I be judged negatively?
And, remembering some of your own posts, I think I can predict your answer, but I'm asking nevertheless. Please don't forget about the other questions, it does become annoying when someone ignores your honest responses and goes on a tangent about something "irrelevant" to the question.
What... Lucifer was good as he was, but wanted to be God and that’s where His free will caused Him to fall from His good state. The same happened when adam and eve wanted to be like God and joined satan in that vain pursuit.
The created cannot become the Creator. The created will always be lower than the Creator therefore the created attempting to bear the burden of the Creator is doomed to failure.
I agree with everything you say here. But it still doesn't answer the question of WHY Adam and Eve were created when the whole sinning, saving, and freedom of will were already established by the Angels? Why couldn't the angels be saved by God's only begotten son, Jesus Christ? It appears angels were qualitatively human or at least could have been made as humans were made, both born capable of sin with the freedom of will. Why make too much of a Good/Perfect/Created by God-thing? Why make man when Angels were doing and are doing the EXACT same thing?
Whets the point of producing another living being without giving them free will. Can it be said that any true living being like mankind could truly be what we are without Free will?? Free will is a great thing.
Ok, but you just said Angels had free will. So why create more beings with free will, when you already had beings with free will, if your only intention was to create a being with the free will to defy your greatness and sin and be saved by your son Jesus Christ, and seek salvation? Angels did all the ground work, why weren't they worthy of being saved?! God created them first.
They never knew good or evil at the start and God said they where Good. Having understanding of Morality means you must understand Immorality. One cannot exist without the other.
So my next question is (and I bet you can guess what it is, because there is clearly a trend here) if the Angels knew what Good and Bad were, why did some choose bad? Why did God give them, even if only a few, the propensity for Immoral behavior, if he was going to punish them for it? It wasn't their choice, as angels, to have a PROPENSITY for Immoral behavior, that's on God, he created them. And by propensity, I mean, pre-existing condition. I don't get to choose to be naturally right handed...though I CAN train my brain to favor the left with enough practice and time. But I will forever have had a propensity for right-handedness, it was innate.
If an Angel such as Lucifer did not have a propensity, in-built, for Immoral behavior then, by default, in his moralization and reasoning of WHY he wants to do things a certain way, like be right-handed, or become God, it naturally proves to be something outside of his control, because, as I said in the irrelevant post to which you responded to, if one doesn't WANT to do something, naturally, he cannot do it. You cannot force your right foot to tap the ground if you WANT/WILL your left foot to tap the ground, just as you can't will yourself to be right handed, just as you can't will yourself to be a naturally miserable person, or a naturally murderous person, try it.
You can train yourself to be murderous, but it's not natural. How did Lucifer TRAIN himself to WANT to become God?
Angels, I would assume, seeing that I've been given room for speculation, have free will, and thus are potentially able to DO THINGS they WILL to do, and NOT DO things they do NOT WILL to do. SO, why WILL yourself to be immoral in the eye of your creator, someone who is more powerful than you and in fact created your very existence so could easily destroy it, if you're not naturally a being that would think that way? What snake sneaked in your tree? What's the point? What will you accomplish?
I've been given the mental faculty to NOT walk off a cliff because it will very likely kill me, and I don't really want to die just yet. Infants capable of crawling, will NOT crawl over a perceptual cliff (covered in glass so as not to harm them if they do) unless their mother is on the other side, calling them and motioning them to come. And even THEN they hesitate, and these infants are often less than 7 months old. Lucifer decided he was going to crawl off a cliff without his father telling him to do so? Or am I wrong?
If Angels didn't know, then why did God punish them?
This is a lot to chew on, Adstar, I know. So I will end it here, a bit over halfway down your responses. Most of the questions proposed in my original posts were variations of the same question, but by answering one a certain way you would have to answer them all similarly, which it seems you've missed answering the first of them by asking me "Why is it important" and it's important because it helps answer allll the questions that follow below it!