Xev,
Fair enough.
Would you agree taht most things that feel good feel good because they are good for us? Of course there are limits, or drugs, but for the most part, stuff that feels good is meant to feel good for a biological reason. Likewise for things that hurt.
There's evidence that attractive people live longer. Regardless of why they live longer (societal implications?), attractive people nevertheless do. Perhaps that's why we find them attractive? We wish to reproduce with someone that is healthy and will love long. As sex is not just sex, but a mechanism to ensure genetic suvival of an individual, then it makes sense that reproducing with fitter individuals (in this case, attractive people) is not only advantageous but also more enjoyable.
Pardon, but that makes no sense whatsoever.There isn't, but there's a reason to reproduce with attractive people. Attractive people, on average, live longer than uglier people. So if sex feels good because it is beneficial, then having sex with attractive people (people who have presumably good genes, or at least good environmental conditions) must be beneficial as it is pleasurable.
Fair enough.
Would you agree taht most things that feel good feel good because they are good for us? Of course there are limits, or drugs, but for the most part, stuff that feels good is meant to feel good for a biological reason. Likewise for things that hurt.
There's evidence that attractive people live longer. Regardless of why they live longer (societal implications?), attractive people nevertheless do. Perhaps that's why we find them attractive? We wish to reproduce with someone that is healthy and will love long. As sex is not just sex, but a mechanism to ensure genetic suvival of an individual, then it makes sense that reproducing with fitter individuals (in this case, attractive people) is not only advantageous but also more enjoyable.