Mr Anonymous said:
No reason at all really why complex hydrocarbons can't be formed out there and collected up by passing bodies and so forth - but then you've got here and how the Earth was back then and if you could find a greater antithesis from the conditions such deposited materials would be finding themselves introduced to you'd have to be looking at the surface of a star.
Not quite that extreme I know but really not all that far off.
Processes tempered in that actual fire of that far back giving rise to ever more increasing complexity on the otherhand... It just strikes me that only something forged here would have any possibility of enduring, unless the planet underwent a global cooling off point considerably earlier than anyone currently imagines...
You're pissing me off too by not being straight forward in your communication abilities. Theres no reason at all why complex hydrocarbons can't be formed here on Earth. So what's your point?
What greater "antithesis" do you propose. Your not talking in the same language terminology as is used in a biology forum. Do you know what the meaning of "antithesis" is? It implies an initial thesis, and you haven't made that thesis clear except for referring to "how the earth was back then and if you could find a greater antithesis from the conditions such deposited materials would be finding themselves introduced to you'd have to be looking at the surface of a star ." You're grammar is so out of whack that your meaning is incomprehensible!
Then you state: "that actual fire of that far back giving rise to ever more increasing complexity." In clearer terms, what you mean is that the origin of life were thermophiles? Then you state: "something forged"? Are we talking about iron or bronze swords?