Mrs.Lucysnow
Valued Senior Member
That was classic Star Trek
Which babe did Kirk do in that episode
The long hair blond who fell in love with the 'god'
That was classic Star Trek
Which babe did Kirk do in that episode
God's who lost believers faded away while hipster God's thrived. A Wiccan friend told me that is how she thinks it works. I thought she was goofy until I realized, not many people pray to Zeus or Bhaal and there hasn't been much ado about them lately.
What do you think?
Its not clear what you are calling upon to indicate a god of diminished powerAh, you found it! Proof that GOd actually exists! Or rather, the idea of God exists.
There is no "what if." It is a fact that if there are less believers then the power of God diminishes.
err ... yet despite such noble attempts to thwart death (or more specifically, to sustain the ego), death (or the complete diminishing of the material ego) has had an unchallenged 100% success rateTake a look at places where God doesn't have many followers? You see, it is not God who is saving people, it's people saving people. If someone is sick, do you see God's power healing? No, you see a doctor or you see a mother brining a cool wash cloth.
given that they are already situated within a theistic paradigm, its not clear why they require conversionIf it were true that God had power without worshippers, then we would see Africans or Chinese being converted without a missionary.
are you serious?Or we would have seen divine intervention on the behalf of the Jews who were murdered by Hitler.
heheNo, someone needs to go in with a gun and put a stop to injustice.
On the contrary, its the nature of god's magnanimity that we continue to exist even if we disbelieve or lose faith in him.God needs believers to exist. Without them, God wouldn't exist.
Its not clear what you are calling upon to indicate a god of diminished power
lightgigantic said:err ... yet despite such noble attempts to thwart death (or more specifically, to sustain the ego), death (or the complete diminishing of the material ego) has had an unchallenged 100% success rate
lightgigantic said:On the contrary, its the nature of god's magnanimity that we continue to exist even if we disbelieve or lose faith in him.
Like say the facility for conscious thought and the sustenance of the cosmic manifestation (since god is the creator, sustainer and ultimate destroyer of all things)Anything that a believer uses as a measurement to God's power.
If you want to erode the social/language elements that frame epistemological models you have effectively trashed about 99% of all we have in the name of science, architecture, music, morality, and art ... which kind of just leaves animal grunting and the satisfaction of base instincts like sleeping, eating, mating and defendingHow would anyone know about God if they had not been told or read the Bible? If no one knew God existed, does God exist?
Pedagogy actually sees communication as the most important tool of learning ... as opposed to some sort of disabling featureMaybe, but it's less likely that people would believe in a singular belief without the subject being communicated.
Its not clear how our dis/belief in god somehow encroaches issues of creation, maintenance and annhilation of the universe and all its constituent elementsThe power of God is relative to the amount of effort believers put forth in the name of God.
HardlyIf everyone believed in God, theorhetically, the world should be perfect. That is the point.
Assuming that the work and worship is in line with the name, its actually the more purified the practitioners become. God doesn't benefit from it. We do.The more believers, the more worship, the more work that is done in the name of God, the more power God has.
If the ultimate annihilation of the material ego (or its subsequent set back at the hands of disease or old age) upsets a practitioner/s faith, they've screwed up at the point of theory (IOW the very notion that the material ego is deserving of some permanence is an error of ascribing eternal qualities to the temporary). Similarly the notion that giving a donation is doing a god a favour is a similar miscalculation caused by a materialistic estimation. Actually god owns everything. All we are on show for is to see to what degree we are capable of acknowledging this ownership with a suitable service attitude. When we get that right, we are no longer shackled by the restraints of material existence.I am generalizing with the word "saving". I mean in every context, not just health. Besides, if death gives a stay of execution because of something believers attribute to the power of God, God's power is grown. If death wins, some believers lose faith. It happens when they can't accept it. When that happens, it's one less person to pay a tithe (effort not necessarily money), when the pool dries up, there is less God is able to do.
If it wasn't possible to entertain a lifestyle where god is a mere concept, the material world would have no functionIf God is an entity, and not a concept, sure. If it is just an idea created to represent a way of life, then it is in existence, its power, is because of those who follow the idea put effort or resource into it.