No.
right. so your an amateur
N/A
not sure what 'N/A' means
I implied neither. I asked where the physical evidence of these claims and anecdotes of radiation effects was.
not clear what you mean here. What i am asking is how can you be a sure a Brazillian farmer who confessed to contact and getting radiation burns can be debunked by you if you haven't examined the evidence. how do y0u KNOW?
i saw him give the report. he seemed down to earth enough, and real.
Why wouldn't it? And what "authorities?" Either the effects were duly noted and documented appropriately or they weren't. If the anecdotes of these effects exist, why wouldn't the evidence to support it?
Look. chck out about Edward Bernays. it might seem like off topic but i dont think so. the story of Edward Bernays, the father of spin shows us that we most definately are not told the truth, about ANYthing. so why should we be about a phemomenon that might confound the powers that be. try and put your head into those dominating people. for example, the military see us as 'civvies'
In addition, government conspiracy is the argument that is frequently brought up when availability of evidence is questioned. This is the same circular type argument used in any paranormal/religious belief. Often, I've heard religious believers cite their faith in a deity or "god willed it" as the basis of their belief. I've also heard believers in poppycock like remote viewing cite the "negative energy" of skeptics as reason why they couldn't demonstrate in their presence.
Theres a lot to go on there.....what you have to understand is this. to have a more generalist approach to all this. understand that the authrorities desire mind conTROL. be under no confusion. they do not want us taking drugs they dont want us to take that might give us 'strange' ideas, yet push drugs that fit in with their criteria. that keep one on their conveyor-belt of conformity. the church did/do same, saying that any experiences not sanctioned by the church was from the 'devil'
UFO evidence does't exist because the government has a lid on it? That's baloney. They couldn't even keep the lid on Abu Graib, Iran-Contra, or Watergate.
I agree. they are inept bastards. but that don't mean they dont keep secrets, like any elite does. look to the small man to see the big. look at cliques and their secrets from outsiders and how they scapegoat......same old
Doubtful. If there is, it is only as it pertains to very explainable events, people and places. For instance, a report on an inquiry about UFOs between the United States and another nation might still be held as secret, but the reason isn't because of the reality of alien spacecraft. The reason is because the nation in question (or the U.S.) doesn't want its diplomatic ties to be known for political reasons.
