I really didn't wanna get involved in this crap discussion but what the hell. It made me angry.
Xeno
I afraid your general attitude hasn't really done you any favours. I'm not gonna address the majority of the crap you've posted but let me tell you something for free.
UFOs exist and they are not all black project air craft. True UFOs that defy explanation do exist. Strange objects have been seen in the sky throughout recorded history. Any possible argument you can give me to the contrary I will quite happily contend with. So go ahead and please try, but be warned that you're gonna get into a very one sided argument!
You are totally convinced that no aliens are here. Fair enough! The fact is we simply don't know what true UFOs represent.
I read elsewhere on this board that the majority of scientists do not take UFOs seriously because they have not been shown any evidence worth studying.
I beg to differ on this point. Many scientists are working under a blanket of ignorance.
If any of you sceptics have never heard of the 1981 Trans en Provence case and the in-depth scientific investigation by Gepan (the French equivalent of NASA) then I suggest you check it out. I for one would like to hear any of you sceptics explain this case away by using the usual tedious arguments. Personally I think many scientists would be amazed if they saw the contents and conclusions of the Gepan report.
Another excellent case is the Hessdalen case from Norway. A team of scientists have studied the strange lights in this remote mountainous region for a long time. There is no doubt that these lights exist and on some occasions they seem to have acted in a very strange way which suggests somthing other than a natural answer. We still don't know what these lights are and science needs to get to grips with this question. A far greater level of reaserch is needed.
Meanwhile you sceptics can be as dismissive and noisy as you like about UFOs. The fact remains is that there is something to all this that we don't understand and it's about time we tried harder to get some answers.
[This message has been edited by Spadge (edited August 17, 1999).]
Xeno
I afraid your general attitude hasn't really done you any favours. I'm not gonna address the majority of the crap you've posted but let me tell you something for free.
UFOs exist and they are not all black project air craft. True UFOs that defy explanation do exist. Strange objects have been seen in the sky throughout recorded history. Any possible argument you can give me to the contrary I will quite happily contend with. So go ahead and please try, but be warned that you're gonna get into a very one sided argument!
You are totally convinced that no aliens are here. Fair enough! The fact is we simply don't know what true UFOs represent.
I read elsewhere on this board that the majority of scientists do not take UFOs seriously because they have not been shown any evidence worth studying.
I beg to differ on this point. Many scientists are working under a blanket of ignorance.
If any of you sceptics have never heard of the 1981 Trans en Provence case and the in-depth scientific investigation by Gepan (the French equivalent of NASA) then I suggest you check it out. I for one would like to hear any of you sceptics explain this case away by using the usual tedious arguments. Personally I think many scientists would be amazed if they saw the contents and conclusions of the Gepan report.
Another excellent case is the Hessdalen case from Norway. A team of scientists have studied the strange lights in this remote mountainous region for a long time. There is no doubt that these lights exist and on some occasions they seem to have acted in a very strange way which suggests somthing other than a natural answer. We still don't know what these lights are and science needs to get to grips with this question. A far greater level of reaserch is needed.
Meanwhile you sceptics can be as dismissive and noisy as you like about UFOs. The fact remains is that there is something to all this that we don't understand and it's about time we tried harder to get some answers.
[This message has been edited by Spadge (edited August 17, 1999).]