I spent my Sunday evening in the usual ritual--reading at Barnes & Noble. A question had crossed my mind lately about the foundation for the fulfillment of OT prophecy in the NT. Quite conveniently, I pulled a book off the shelf called Jesus: One Hundred Years Before Christ, by Alvar Ellegard, The Overlook Press, Peter Mayer Publications, Inc., Lewis Hollow Road, Woodstock, NY 12498, 1999, and began to read through it.
It states that Paul, knowing the prophecies of the OT writings, of course, simply created the fulfillment of these prophecies when he wrote (or had someone else write) parts of the NT. Now it all made sense! The prophecies haven't been fulfilled, yet! It's only a smoke screen as I suspected.
As I continued reading, I came across another interesting theory that the disciples chosen by Jesus were actually the followers of Paul and not Jesus! I always knew there was a different time-span between Paul and Jesus, but this would explain Paul's mythological creation of Jesus's disciples who lived in the time of Paul, not Jesus.
The more I read, the more I believe that Jesus was just a fictional character; yet, there is still a part of my conscious that tells me Jesus was a real person but not the savior Paul created. What this means to me is that the story of the Annunciation is a lie. The story of Jesus's miraculous birth is a lie. The story of the Wedding at Cana is a lie. The story of the Last Supper is a lie. The story of the crucifixion is a lie. The story of the resurrection is a lie. The story of Pentecost is a lie. The story of Jesus's Ascension is a lie. The story of the Ascension of Mary, Jesus's Mother, is a lie. The story of the Son of God is a lie. The story of salvation is a lie. Now I wonder just what part of Christianity can be true? How have these lies survived 2000 years? How was Paul inspired to create this myth so people would believe it for centuries? Was it really Paul who wielded that kind of power or was it the ignorance of the believers who were afraid to question it? If one-third of the human race can still believe this story is true, what else are we duped to believe? If none of the tenets of Christianity are true, why do people still defend them? What are they afraid of? The truth?
It states that Paul, knowing the prophecies of the OT writings, of course, simply created the fulfillment of these prophecies when he wrote (or had someone else write) parts of the NT. Now it all made sense! The prophecies haven't been fulfilled, yet! It's only a smoke screen as I suspected.
As I continued reading, I came across another interesting theory that the disciples chosen by Jesus were actually the followers of Paul and not Jesus! I always knew there was a different time-span between Paul and Jesus, but this would explain Paul's mythological creation of Jesus's disciples who lived in the time of Paul, not Jesus.
The more I read, the more I believe that Jesus was just a fictional character; yet, there is still a part of my conscious that tells me Jesus was a real person but not the savior Paul created. What this means to me is that the story of the Annunciation is a lie. The story of Jesus's miraculous birth is a lie. The story of the Wedding at Cana is a lie. The story of the Last Supper is a lie. The story of the crucifixion is a lie. The story of the resurrection is a lie. The story of Pentecost is a lie. The story of Jesus's Ascension is a lie. The story of the Ascension of Mary, Jesus's Mother, is a lie. The story of the Son of God is a lie. The story of salvation is a lie. Now I wonder just what part of Christianity can be true? How have these lies survived 2000 years? How was Paul inspired to create this myth so people would believe it for centuries? Was it really Paul who wielded that kind of power or was it the ignorance of the believers who were afraid to question it? If one-third of the human race can still believe this story is true, what else are we duped to believe? If none of the tenets of Christianity are true, why do people still defend them? What are they afraid of? The truth?