Were Adam and Eve the first people?

When you wrote you had made God look like a fool.

Are you sure about that? Quote before calling me a liar.
Would you like me to bang it out again for you?? You're also a thief!! You take arguments that aren't yours and attempt to make them your own.

Such as?

Do you have any thoughts of your own?? You cannot even build your own case from which to debate from. :) You're as bitter as a Lemon-tree. :)

:)

James, this is getting ridiculous.

Moderate please.
 
James, this is getting ridiculous.
Moderate please.
That's what the Ignore button is for.

I'm pretty sure Frogger is simply mistaken in his interpretation of what you said. But his vehemence and erratic behavior is off-putting. And it outweighs his contributions.
 
That's what the Ignore button is for.

I'm pretty sure Frogger is simply mistaken in his interpretation of what you said. But his vehemence and erratic behavior is off-putting. And it outweighs his contributions.

I don't ignore people.

It is up to moderators to step in when someone clearly has no intention to debate.
 
Well who else would write about the origins of humanity on Earth?

It would be interesting to see the results of carbon dating on the manuscript (probably owned by religion.)

But the writings still will not continue for eternity. :)
 
I don't ignore people.

It is up to moderators to step in when someone clearly has no intention to debate.
I'd say Frogger has not really violated any rules that require moderator intervention here.
The ignore button is there so you don't have to debate with a vexatious member.

Anyway, carry on.
 
SAAVIK: May I ask how you dealt with the test?
KIRK: You may ask. (uncomfortable pause) That's a little joke.
SAAVIK: Humor. It is a difficult concept. It is not logical.
KIRK: We learn by doing.

Humour, is it not logical?

We certainly do learn by doing :)
 
Are you sure about that? Quote before calling me a liar.
James, this is getting ridiculous.
Moderate please.
Welcome to the other side of theism. Now do you understand the atheist's obstacle in having a serious discussion with many theists.

I am not judging, just stating from my own experience when debating the conceptual merits of a God.
Theists are prone to judge the person (using ad hominem), even other theists, and not pay attention to content of the argument, other than outright dismissal.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to the other side of theism. Now do you understand the atheist's obstacle in having a serious discussion with many theists.

I am not judging, just stating from my own experience when debating the conceptual merits of a God.
Theists are prone to judge the person (using ad hominem), even other theists, and not pay attention to content of the argument, other than outright dismissal.

What's this got to do with someone calling me a liar with no proof because there isn't any?

Try judging me, see where it gets you.
 
davewhite04:

How about you debate me?
On what topic?

Maybe about that debate video that showed you how to debate.
I haven't watched it. What is there to debate in that?

What is the point of creating a thread starting a debate for "evidence" that God exists, when you know fine well there is no answer. 1000 posts of pointlessness.
I don't know there is no evidence. Certain theists right here on sciforums claim that they have evidence, so I started a thread and invited them to present the evidence they said they have. 1000 posts later, there's not much to show for it, but that's hardly my fault.
 
Back
Top