wait for it.. wait for it.. OH DAMN

I believe the officer went to far by punching her with a closed fist.

officers do have the right to use force...

and to be honest id rather get punched in the face 50 times before i got maced or tazed did both at a my officer buddies training and god damn they suck more than you can imagine
 
The can use "reasonable" force but it seems that in this case he went "overboard" by striking her in the face. This is my opinion but perhaps we will find out what will happen to him in the weeks ahead when they investigate this matter.
 
She was physically fighting him and got what she deserved, in my opinion.
 
Brand me sexist if you like, but you don't hit a woman. You don't, you shouldn't... It's some unwritten rule and has anthropological roots. Don't ask me why, I can not provide you an unquestionable ethical reason or moral logic; I only feel it deep inside my DNA if you like, but it's category A wrong.

A police officer hitting a citizen in the face requires another type of examination.
 
that was police brutality. Fuck that cop. Stupid ass pig. Beating on someone for fuckin jay walking. Im moving to Greece where the people are beating the shit out of the cops
 
He didn't need to punch her in the face... clearly he had an edge already as far as strength goes. Why couldn't he have just forced her on the ground and handcuffed her?
 
I support the officer 100%

He should've shot her. The law is the law.

He should have shot her!? Are you insane?!
They were jaywalking, and he got physical WAY before she did. SHE WAS 17!
Watch the video i just linked. Didnt read their rights or anything.
 
He should have shot her!? Are you insane?!
They were jaywalking, and he got physical WAY before she did. SHE WAS 17!
Watch the video i just linked. Didnt read their rights or anything.

Not insane at all.

Why shouldn't violators of the law be shot? Give me one good reason.
 
Brand me sexist if you like, but you don't hit a woman. You don't, you shouldn't... It's some unwritten rule and has anthropological roots. .
I agree you shouldn't hit a woman. But if she initiates the fight, what are you supposed to do? Just take it?

No. This girl got what she deserved.
 
Not insane at all.

Why shouldn't violators of the law be shot? Give me one good reason.

Because that male cop was in no life danger from a 17 year old female. These people are human beings, not prisoners, not terriost, not crimanls. Cops can do whatever they want. They are the states protecters and the indivsiuals abusers.
She didnt have a weopan, and she was defending her rights as a HUMAN BEING to not be physicaly assualted even if its by a police officer.
He physicaly attacked her first.
 
But if she initiates the fight, what are you supposed to do? Just take it?

Me? I was hit by a woman before, and I just took it. Plus, "initiation" is subject to discussion. This woman did not hit the officer, she resisted, that's true. And the officer lost his temper and reached a quick conclusion that if she is resisting he has right to hit her. Sorry, it's unacceptable by my standards.
 
He confronted her physicaly first according to eyewitnesses.

You do realize that the police have the right to restrain people, don't you? If he had jumped out of his car and immediately started throwing punches, I'd agree with you. But I'm guessing that wasn't the case...
 
Because that male cop was in no life danger from a 17 year old female. These people are human beings, not prisoners, not terriost, not crimanls. Cops can do whatever they want. They are the states protecters and the indivsiuals abusers.
She didnt have a weopan, and she was defending her rights as a HUMAN BEING to not be physicaly assualted even if its by a police officer.
He physicaly attacked her first.

LoL!

You do remember that she's the criminal here, right? Criminals deserve all that and more.
 
Back
Top