With that attitude you are easy to manipulate and you are ripe for tragedy.
Of course. Because enforcement of domestic assault laws are skewed in the woman's favour.
Being in control of the situation sometimes means taking a couple blows while you calm the other person down.
Would you expect a woman to do the same thing? Instead of defending herself, take a 'couple of blows' while the man calms down?
If you go berserk every time you get touched,
You should actually read my posts. I didn't say I would hit someone if they 'touched' me, but if they *assaulted* me.
Tiassa said:
Two points in response:
• I have some understanding of this woman's frailty. You do not.
I still find it difficult to believe that you could be so sure that you would be likely to kill her in one hit.
• Ever hear of Jack Nance? He played Pete in Twin Peaks, Henry Spencer in Eraserhead, and built a respectable resume in Hollywood through his career. He got in a fight in a donut shop one day in 1996. Reportedly, he received a single blow to the head in the altercation. The next day he was found dead of the injury.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Nance
However, some are skeptical about the factuality of the fight. One police investigator who worked on the case doubts that the scuffle ever happened, and it was "more likely that Nance just got drunk and banged his head."[4] Acquaintances note that Nance was a notoriously late sleeper and was rarely ever awake at the time he claimed the altercation took place, and that the circumstances of his death were most unusual.
I'm not saying that it's not possible to kill someone with one hit. But either you'd need to be a skilled fighter/boxer, have your assailant fall to the ground and hit their head, or just be real unlucky. Of course, all three also apply when a woman attacks a man. So perhaps a man should view every attack on him as a potential threat to his life?
With impunity? When the assailant is stronger? Nay, sir. Each situation requires its own assessment and response. I didn't think that was so hard to figure out.
So if someone physically weaker kicks, hits, bites and eye gouges you, what would you do? And if you're thinking 'Leave the situation', assume that they follow you, as I have seen in the past.
I certainly wouldn't aim to kill you.
No shit. But you would do *something*, and I suspect that if you thought punching me was the only way you could stop me assaulting you, you'd do it.
“ As the old saying goes: If you're man enough to hit a man, then you're man enough to be hit by a man. ”
And the old saying is inherently sexist. After all, if a woman is man enough to hit a man?
The proverb is simply stating that if a woman wishes to act as a man's equal, she will also be treated as their equal in all things (particularly in regards to domestic violence). Or, as the other old saying goes: "You can't have your cake and eat it too." Applying the same standards and expectations on behaviour consistently across both genders is decidely not sexist.
Although I guess you could argue that it is a little misandrous, given that it ascribes 'violence' to be a male trait. But it still makes a valid point, despite some of its underlying misandrous assumptions.
And if your response exceeds reasonable bounds, you will be held criminally accountable. Which would, of course, be tough shit for you.
I'd try not to exceed reasonable bounds. And if I did, well, I'd defend my actions in the station and law courts.