First off, let's not assign things to me I didn't say. I appreciate you're possibly pissed at IAC - and, to be honest, he's a troll.
Second: I don't discredit Michael Behe's abilities as a biologist on grounds that he's into ID. ID is a crock so far as I can tell (and even if there were actual deviance from incremental neutralist or selectionist trajectories, it wouldn't mean that any god was involved) but I don't say he's not a credible biologist because he's a proponent thereof. I feel he's being ridiculous by working this dead end theory, but I know a number of other biologists who are also fairly ridiculous and/or timewasters with respect to the specialization they've chosen (naturalistic heterozygosity-fitness correlation springs to mind; also the presentation of base phenotypic plasticity as GxE; also that asseating prof who stole one of my ideas and presented it as his own, the balding prick). I respect Behe for his mathematical interests; I merely disagree with his opinions. He merely happens, to my mind, to be wrong.