Personally, I think the cops should have 105mm howitzers mounted on the patrol cars. Don't chase the crimials, just blow the fuckers straight into hell ...and don't bother with those silly-assed trials that'll just let them right back out of jail.
umm dude, if they need to be defibed then THEY ARNT GETTING UP AT ALL. They are clinically DEAD
It's amazing to me that some people should be otherwise so intelligent, but unable to think through simple propositions when their alternative is arbitrary, petulant opposition.
^^
oh so you mean are only talking about this particular specific made up scenario? thats different.
Doubtful, remain, may be... Are you actually asserting anything here John? Or just covering all the bases?its doubtful that a critically injured or close to death person would remain in hand cuffs but joes personal experience may be very isolated and limited.
it's called pandering to humanity's bloodlust.I'll just point out how silly I find it that police tapes should be shown as entertainment, . . .
who's holding cops beyond reproach?. . . yet somehow the precious cops should be held as beyond reproach for whatever actions those tapes reveal.
no, what's amazing is how everyone seems to be an armchair cop, and a good one too!It's amazing to me that some people should be otherwise so intelligent, but unable to think through simple propositions when their alternative is arbitrary, petulant opposition.
and the thing that complicates the matter is that it's highly unlikely that anyone responding to this thread was an actual witness.That said, the issue is, of course, more complicated than any one wild-chase scene might suggest.
maybe because the cop car had firearms in it?
a car can indeed be viewed as a deadly weapon, and seeing as the person refused to stop the first time mitigates the cops actions.
the circumstances surrounding the aforementioned issue dictates what constitutes force. since i wasn't there and i have not read any verifiable information i can not say whether the cop did or did not have "the right" to use deadly force.aren't people allowed to carry firearms and drive cars though? running from the cops and stealing a car doesn't give cops the right to shoot you.
i could imagine scenarios where the cop would have a right to.jason bourne bashed people with newspapers, if someone runs from the cops and is carrying a newspaper, should they shoot them too?
I've always wondered about a high speed chase in a city large enough to have a police helicopter. With one of those to follow the car, why bother with the high speed chase?
cops do not shoot you for "just carrying a newspaper"
the circumstances surrounding the aforementioned issue dictates what constitutes force. since i wasn't there and i have not read any verifiable information i can not say whether the cop did or did not have "the right" to use deadly force.
cops do not shoot you for "just carrying a newspaper"
as for screaming "die cop, die" who cares even if he did? words arnt enough to qualify for deadly force