Let me ask you a question Joe.
Do you think if mentally ill people could not get such easy access to firearms, that it would go some way in reducing these particular types of crimes?
For example, Lanza's mother was apparently an avid gun collector. If she had not had the ability to amass so many weapons, do you think it would have made it harder for her mentally ill son to do what he did? Do you think background checks on not just the person purchasing the firearms, but also anyone who lives in their house or may have access to such firearms could potentially lessen the chance of such crimes from happening? Do you think restricting what type of firearms people can buy could potentially reduce the risk?
Many years ago, in Australia, we had a very mentally ill man go on a rampage and massacred dozens of people. His firearms were legally purchased and with ease. Firearms laws in Australia at that point in time were lackluster. We were coming off another mass shooting, one my own cousin managed to survive by hiding under a desk as the shooter roamed the floor he was on.. Once Port Arthur occurred, the overwhelming majority of the population said enough was enough and tighter gun control laws had to be put in place. To date, we have not had another mass shooting. The same in Scotland and the UK.
To get a gun in Australia, one has to go through numerous police checks and evaluations, and one cannot purchase certain types of firearms. In short, you need to have a very good reason for purchasing a firearm here.
And I have to wonder why the people in the US are so reticent in having to undergo such checks to obtain firearms. I understand it is in the Constitution, but that does not mean it should be an automatic right. Some levels of public safety needs to also be considered. I mean look at Lanza's mother. She had a son who was mentally ill living in her house. One who was so ill that she apparently ended up
homeschooling him. She did everything right. And yet, even with a mentally ill person in her house, she was legally allowed to purchase and keep a range of firearms. In your opinion, do you think a person should face background checks and that family members should also be checked, especially if they live in the same house as where the guns would be stored?