Unorthadox Things.

[glitch]

Science, FAIL!

There's two possiblities:

1) There's no sence to what I say.

2) You don't understand it.

There is but one factor of differentiation, therefore no way of knowing which.

We draw two points and create two possibilities, here or there, there is no way or defining which, because apparency is the same regardless of location.

We can just say the apparency is evident, no matter which is true.

 

[phlogistician]

Learn to spell.

 

[glitch]

Learn to spell.

I know that I have a formula which is comprehensively structured The problem is it denies the fundamentals taught in geometry. Let me demonstrate exactly where the disparity lies.

To establish an origin point one also uses a blank page representitive of empty space, then when the second point is added we say there must be a distance (consisting of the primary space).

The problem lies in using space as a pre-ordained fundamental and as a relative definition.

The formulation I came up with makes space consequential, not fundamental.

I'm working on my English.