Questions underlying the structure of geometric models get to me a bit. As I see it one needs to create an infinite space in which a construct can be made, so it is all based on a primal medium in which occurance is possible, and since it rests upon this fundamental singularity it bears relevance to the truth, hence making geometric relationship possible but under a fundamental coherency to the primary empty construct.
So the prerequisites are a state of 'empty' and something different by which to define 'existant', and some function of discernment must recognize the disparity, so perception becomes intergral to the black vs white formula.
As I see it, four qualities result in the basic premise of reasoning.
1) Infinite location possibility (as in 'empty space')
2) Something not 'empty space' (best defined as 0d, opposite to the primary)
3) The discernment quality relating the comparitive difference.
4) The overall relationship between them.
I think this fundamental basis brings coherance to physical laws and geometric relationships and concurrency between locations.
:bugeye:
So the prerequisites are a state of 'empty' and something different by which to define 'existant', and some function of discernment must recognize the disparity, so perception becomes intergral to the black vs white formula.
As I see it, four qualities result in the basic premise of reasoning.
1) Infinite location possibility (as in 'empty space')
2) Something not 'empty space' (best defined as 0d, opposite to the primary)
3) The discernment quality relating the comparitive difference.
4) The overall relationship between them.
I think this fundamental basis brings coherance to physical laws and geometric relationships and concurrency between locations.
:bugeye: