The Disclosure Project’s conference held May 9, 2001 (National Press Club Conference) touched on the issue of non-disclosure agreements signed by participants in the above black sectors.
Greer stated that since these above black operations circumvent a country’s constitution then these above black operations would be illegal, from that assertion then it follows all non-disclosure agreements would be deemed also illegal thus, null and void.
Looking at this issue from a human perspective and as a global concern not localized individual country’s nationalism then I would agree that all non-disclosure agreements signed by individuals as members of their country would be null and void.
The assertion of threat to individuals that signed these non-disclosure agreements would be an act of terror by those whose intent is not in the best interest of global humanity.
It would then be the responsibility of the global community, supposedly the United Nations & Global Security to protect the signee’s of these non-disclosure agreements from the terror by those whose intent is not in the best interest of global humanity.
Does not global security over rule national security?
Protecting Iraqi’s from Iraq?
Protecting Kuwaiti’s from Iraq?
Protecting global peace from Hitler’s?
Protecting Armenian’s from Turkey?
The list goes on.
So if there is a global threat to humanity from an outside source that is not yet publicly acknowledged but can be directly traced to information withheld by these illegal above black operation then it would be the responsibility of the United Nations & Global Security to address this. Disclosure of this threat would be the jurisdiction of the United Nations & Global Security since it has become very apparent that non-disclosure is allowing harm to continue; harm to humanity as a whole, harm to individuals and groups of individuals.
To quote United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan from the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change in an address to the General Assembly on 23 September 2003, “We must understand that a threat to some is a threat to all, and needs to be addressed accordingly.”
http://www.un-globalsecurity.org/panel.asp
There will become a point in time when disclosure will be inevitable, so the United Nations & Global Security must decide if disclosure now will result in less turmoil or disclosure later when decision making will not be in their hands, totally outside any global control.
Greer stated that since these above black operations circumvent a country’s constitution then these above black operations would be illegal, from that assertion then it follows all non-disclosure agreements would be deemed also illegal thus, null and void.
Looking at this issue from a human perspective and as a global concern not localized individual country’s nationalism then I would agree that all non-disclosure agreements signed by individuals as members of their country would be null and void.
The assertion of threat to individuals that signed these non-disclosure agreements would be an act of terror by those whose intent is not in the best interest of global humanity.
It would then be the responsibility of the global community, supposedly the United Nations & Global Security to protect the signee’s of these non-disclosure agreements from the terror by those whose intent is not in the best interest of global humanity.
Does not global security over rule national security?
Protecting Iraqi’s from Iraq?
Protecting Kuwaiti’s from Iraq?
Protecting global peace from Hitler’s?
Protecting Armenian’s from Turkey?
The list goes on.
So if there is a global threat to humanity from an outside source that is not yet publicly acknowledged but can be directly traced to information withheld by these illegal above black operation then it would be the responsibility of the United Nations & Global Security to address this. Disclosure of this threat would be the jurisdiction of the United Nations & Global Security since it has become very apparent that non-disclosure is allowing harm to continue; harm to humanity as a whole, harm to individuals and groups of individuals.
To quote United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan from the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change in an address to the General Assembly on 23 September 2003, “We must understand that a threat to some is a threat to all, and needs to be addressed accordingly.”
http://www.un-globalsecurity.org/panel.asp
There will become a point in time when disclosure will be inevitable, so the United Nations & Global Security must decide if disclosure now will result in less turmoil or disclosure later when decision making will not be in their hands, totally outside any global control.
