UFO's and why they blink out.

[Magical Realist]

So, that's a "no", right? - you have no relevant evidence, so you are flooding/trolling, right?

You asked for relevant evidence of ufo craft. That's what we were discussing. That's what you're getting.

 

[Magical Realist]

And since you ignored it the first time:

Chicago O'Hare saucer sighting of 2008:

"At approximately 16:15 CST on Tuesday, November 7, 2006, federal authorities at Chicago O'Hare International Airport received a report that a group of twelve airport employees were witnessing a metallic, saucer-shaped craft hovering over Gate C-17.

The object was first spotted by a ramp employee who was pushing back United Airlines Flight 446, which was departing Chicago for Charlotte, North Carolina. The employee apprised Flight 446's crew of the object above their aircraft. It is believed that both the pilot and co-pilot also witnessed the object.

Several independent witnesses outside of the airport also saw the object. One described a "blatant" disc-shaped craft hovering over the airport which was "obviously not clouds." According to this witness, nearby observers gasped as the object shot through the clouds at high velocity, leaving a clear blue hole in the cloud layer.[1] The hole reportedly seemed to close itself shortly afterward.

According to the Chicago Tribune's Jon Hilkevitch, "The disc was visible for approximately five minutes and was seen by close to a dozen United Airlines employees, ranging from pilots to supervisors, who heard chatter on the radio and raced out to view it."[2][3] So far, no photographic evidence of the UFO has surfaced, although it was reported to Hilkevitch that one of the United Airlines pilots was in possession of a digital camera at the time of the sighting and may have photographed the event."===https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_O'Hare_International_Airport_UFO_sighting

 

[Magical Realist]

Westall, Australia silvery disk UFO 1966:

"At approximately 11.00 am on Wednesday, 6 April 1966, a class of students and a teacher from Westall High School (now Westall Secondary College) were just completing a sport activity on the main oval when an object, described as being a grey saucer-shaped craft with a slight purple hue and being about twice the size of a family car, was alleged to have been seen. Witness descriptions were mixed: Andrew Greenwood, a science teacher, told The Dandenong Journal at the time that he saw a silvery-green disc. According to witnesses the object was descending and then crossed and overflew the high school's south-west corner, going in a south-easterly direction, before disappearing from sight as it descended behind a stand of trees and into a paddock at The Grange in front of the Westall State School (primary students). After a short period (approximately 20 minutes) the object - with witnesses now numbering over 200 - then climbed at speed and departed towards the north-west. As the object gained altitude some accounts describe it as having been pursued from the scene by five unidentified aircraft which circled the object."====https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westall_UFO

 

[Russ_Watters]

You asked for relevant evidence of ufo craft. That's what we were discussing. That's what you're getting.

In order to be "relevant" to the thread, it has to be "blinking out". You haven't provided such. We both know you are just flailing/flooding here.

Broader, though, I'd be delighted to see *one* quality alien spacecraft sighting instead of a mountain of garbage. Feel free to point to the one you think is most compelling and explain why you think it is compelling.

 

[Russ_Watters]

Sorry, couldn't resist making fun of one piece of garbage:

And since you ignored it the first time:

Chicago O'Hare saucer sighting of 2008:

"Several independent witnesses outside of the airport also saw the object. One described a "blatant" disc-shaped craft hovering over the airport which was "obviously not clouds."

When I was in the Navy, a Russian jet fighter flew over my ship. It never would have occurred to me to describe it as "obviously not clouds". Why even bring it up unless people described it as clouds? From this description, probably was clouds.

So far, no photographic evidence of the UFO has surfaced, although it was reported to Hilkevitch that one of the United Airlines pilots was in possession of a digital camera at the time of the sighting and may have photographed the event."

Really? There might be photos? And can I see them? No? Great, that's.....30 seconds of my life I'll never get back.

 

[Magical Realist]

In order to be "relevant" to the thread, it has to be "blinking out".

No..in order to be relevant about your and Dave's and my discussion on whether ufos exist or not and your consequent request for evidence, I have only to provide evidence for ufos. Which is now posted. So you know what you can do with your bitching, troll.

 

[Magical Realist]

In order to be "relevant" to the thread, it has to be "blinking out". You haven't provided such. We both know you are just flailing/flooding here.

Broader, though, I'd be delighted to see *one* quality alien spacecraft sighting instead of a mountain of garbage. Feel free to point to the one you think is most compelling and explain why you think it is compelling.

I think your done here troll.

 

[Russ_Watters]

No..in order to be relevant about your and Dave's and my discussion on whether ufos exist or not and your consequent request for evidence, I have only to provide evidence for ufos. Which is now posted. So you know what you can do with your bitching.

A "UFO" is anything seen in the sky that the person who saw it can't identify. They certainly do exist. Boring. Regardless, this thread is about a specific class. But I'll even set that aside and let you broaden it: go ahead. Provide your analysis of one quality sighting.

 

[Russ_Watters]

I think your done here troll.

I think you should learn grammar, but we can't always get what we want.

 

[Magical Realist]

Really? There might be photos? And can I see them? No? Great, that's.....30 seconds of my life I'll never get back.

And if I provided a photo you'd just say it was faked. We all know how you operate troll.

 

[Magical Realist]

"In its initial definition, the USAF stated that a "UFOB" was "any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object." ===
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidentified_flying_object

 

[Russ_Watters]

And if I provided a photo you'd just say it was faked.

So it is better for you to not even try, I guess. That's the way you apparently live. How's it working out for you? Oh, wait, I already know.

 

[DaveC426913]

I was promised extraordinary photos of UFOs, not witnesses telling what they saw.

Consult the hundreds of photos of ufos since 1998.

You've posted ancient stuff. Any UFO footage more recent than the Reagan administration? Like, say after the invention of cell phones?

This is a total bait & switch. MR, I gave you the floor. I gave you every chance to blow our socks off with recent high quality pics since 1998. You squandered it.


We're back to this:

 

[Magical Realist]

I was promised extraordinary photos of UFOs, not witnesses telling what they saw.



You've posted ancient stuff. Any UFO footage more recent than the Reagan administration? Like, say after the invention of cell phones?

This is a total bait & switch. MR, I gave you the floor. I gave you every chance to blow our socks off. You squandered it.



We're back to this:

You can't be this stupid. What about all those ufo photo links doesn't meet your requirement for ufo photos? Or are you just upset that I provided you all this evidence which you can't refute? I'm not going to take your hand and step you thru all the post 1998 photos. You're a big boy now. Clink on the links and view for yourself.

 

[DaveC426913]

You can't be this stupid.

There is no need for name-calling.
Address the issue, not the issuer.

What about all those ufo photo links doesn't meet your requirement for ufos? Or are you just upset that I provided you all this evidence which you can't refute?

You promised me photos. Extraordinary photos. Recent photos.

photos of ufos since 1998

You had the chance to play your best hand. And your best hand is between a third and a half century old.
That damns your case more than anything I could have done.

 

[Magical Realist]

There is no need for name-calling.
Address the issue, not the issuer.



You promised me photos. Extraordinary photos. Recent photos.


You had the chance to play your best hand. And your best hand is between a third and a half century old.
That damns your case more than anything I could have done.

I told you where to find the photos. They're in the links. If you are incapable of clicking on links then there's nothing more I'm doing for you. I know trolling when I see it.

 

[Russ_Watters]

I told you where to find the photos. They're in the links. If you are incapable of clicking on links then there's nothing more I'm doing for you.

Your refusal to highlight a single one is a clear indication that you are aware that none are compelling. I generally accept that you are True Believer, but here I can see that you aren't even buying what you are shoveling.

 

[Magical Realist]

Your refusal to highlight a single one is a clear indication that you are aware that none are compelling. I generally accept that you are True Believer, but here I can see that you aren't even buying what you are shoveling.

Bullshit. I gave you 8 compelling cases of ufo encounters along with hundreds of the best photos of ufos ever taken. You're trollish attitude in all this, trying to switch it all over to blinking objects instead, and now Dave's bullshit about me not providing post '98 photos, is why I'm not doing another thing for any of you. You have the evidence you claimed I never provide. And you have both been totally refuted.

 

[Bells]

Mod Note

If you can't argue without personal insults, then simply don't post.

Thread closed because there is nothing left to salvage in this thread because just about every post in the last few pages amount to personal insults in some fashion.