Oh my god, you aren't implying Doreen doesn't check her facts?
Think about what you are suggesting. Should an instance where a non-anomalous id is verified make people assume all other observations are also non-anomalous?Originally Posted by James R
I wonder whether fully-explained UFOs such as this one ever change the minds of any UFO nuts.
Does this mean, for example, that if there is one sighting of, say, a mountain lion in Maine and it turns out to be some other animal all other sighting should be assumed to be mistaken or some other animal?
Ah yes, the hallmark of the crank .... specious analogies.Doreen said:How dumb does one have to be to be skeptical of official explanations?
Hm.
Like WOMD in Iraq. All those stupid skeptics.