That's BS. Dreams means dreams. Your interpretation of what you assume the authors to mean is in variance with what the words say. Your reading is off big time.
Claiming something is true doesn't make it true. I demonstrated that the author classifies dreams, hynagogia, and hynopompia as a single entity... "dreams".
I noted that dreams, hypnagogia, and hynopompia are are not the same... which is why we have different words for them in the English language.
I noted that the authors did not educate their test subject on the difference between dreams, hynogogia, and hypnopompia .
I noted that the authors survey questions did not have any elements to differentiate between dreams, hypnogogia, and hypnopompia (in study 1). In study 2 the questions did separate hypnogogia reasonably.
Maybe you didn't understand the conclusion so I will assert it clearly. A randomly selected group of people are not going to have the same education. Because of this, they will consist of members who don't know the difference between dreams, hynogogia, and hypnopompia.
You're welcome to show otherwise; however, you will need to demonstrate rather than claim.
I wasn't saying I have had the same exact experience as Just Not There, but that I have mistaken dreams for reality before. I have stated I am not sure of the mechanism (fair play you acknowledge this in your post).
I realize that wasn't what you were saying. The statement you used was:
"I have to admit I have experienced the phenomenon explained here"
And the phenomena explained was very specific. A better way of stating what you meant might be:
"I have to admit I have mistaken dreams for reality"
I have said that I have mixed up dreams with reality before (only a few times whilst younger). I didn't elaborate on the mechanism of how it happened to me. You assumed my experience was the same as the thread creator's, and I can see how you assumed this. I will clear it up now: I was saying simply that the phenomenon of dreams being mistaken for reality is something I have experienced, and not a copy cat of Just Not There's experience.
mmhmm.
Ok we are going forward now
The way you realise is by talking to someone who was involved in the memory, and them having no recollection of of the scenario. This is ultimately never logically conclusive because one could always assume the other party simply can't remember the conversation/scenario due to THEIR bad memory!
Wouldn't that just mean the memory is false? How do you know that the false memory originated from a dream?
I must say that I do not agree with your assessment of the survey's text. I believe the survey was done on dreamers, as it states so. Please reread the intro to the essay:
There is no mention here of anything other than DREAMS. Whether they are experienced in deep sleep, shallower sleep whilst falling asleep or waking up is irrelevant to the mixing up. A dream is a dream. A dream becoming a false memory is a dream becoming a false memory. The mention of "sleep" in the describing paragraph of the study means that they were studying DREAMERS. People were reporting dreams experienced whilst SLEEPING:
There's no definition of "dream" that was established. Do you think everyone who was surveyed inherently understands the difference between hynagogia, dreams, and hynopompia?
So the DREAMS were either whilst asleep, whilst waking from sleep, whilst falling to sleep. Dreams all.
That's a technical error on the side of the publication. Hallucinatory experiences while falling asleep are NOT dreams. They are called hypnagogic hallucinations. They are explicitly defined separate from dreams because they are a unique phenomena. Similarly, hallucinatry experiences while waking up are NOT dreams. They are called hynopompic hallucinations. The authors of the article INCORRECTLY classified them as dreams, but they are in fact separate and unique phenomena.
You can learn about these distinctions in various cognitive/neurology/psychology classes or read about them in publications such as:
Mavromatis, A. (1987). Hypnagogia: the Unique State of Consciousness Between Wakefulness and Sleep. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
T. Balkin, A. Braun, et al., "The process of awakening: A PET study of regional brain activity patterns mediating the reestablishment of alertness and consciousness," Brain, vol. 125, 2002, pp. 2308–19.
So do you admit that the phenomenon of MISTAKING DREAMS FOR REALITY is a common occurrence?
I am not sure why you would want me to admit something I am not arguing against; however, the answer to your question is "no, I cannot". The primary reason is because your question is too subjective. To try and objectify it a little, we can observe that the context of the question defines the word "common" as "frequent". The definition of the word "frequent" means occurring or appearing quite often or at close intervals. Now, we're dealing a little more firmness, but how often qualifies as "quite often?" and how close qualifies as "close intervals"? What I can say from reading the publication is that if we define a "common occurence" as 25% of the time then the answer to your question is no.