What the hell are you talking about?Really you have a calculation that includes all "matter" since the dawn of "real" time? Proof please. Better yet, if I were you I wouldn't even attempt to translate whatever fact checking you intend to do into a "peer review journal". I would just place the equation that has been calculated into the silly little zero's you keep spouting off in your equations. Problem solved. But indeed still as your teacher I want a long drawn out apology note from all the sheep that keep having their doubts at this "time".
Remove foot from mouth, then talk.
Nothing to do with superiority. I will quite happily say when someone knows something or when they know more than me. Guest, QH, Ben, CptBork, Rpenner, Prom, Temur and plenty of others here I consider people who know their stuff in particular areas, including areas where I don't know much.In fact, if anyone is playing a cherade, it was alphanumeric. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm sick to the back bone with his hightened sense of superiority.
Each of them have shown many times that they are learned in certain areas and they have done so all without having to write 'essays' on their area of work. Instead they engage in honest discussion. Some of them have said things which were wrong, but they accept that and learn from it.
Those are traits you don't display and I don't consider you someone who actually understands what it is they talk about. If you could actually discuss things maybe I'd be more pleasant.
But my scientific knowledge and work isn't the sum of my forum posts. I spend 8 hours a day, 5 days a work at a desk doing work, time spent here doesn't hinder my ongoing learning. In the months since you joined I've learnt a great deal of physics, I can't say the same for you. You've obviously put in time to look through enough to try to spout enough crap to make it seem like you understand but that is wasted time.He also accuses us of wasting our time here. But who is really wasting their time? He spend all the time he would here, arguing with cranks, cranks who are a lot worse than me in their opinionated views and theories.
If we were to put my time working and my time online together under the heading "Stuff I do to do with science" then I 'waste' a very small percentage of that here, the vast majority I spend constructively. If we did the same for you then you're squandering the majority of your time because you're not actually learning any science, you're learning how to appear to be doing science.To me, that is one of the biggest waste of times for I know by reflection, that I do not spend anytime reading those threads, but he spends loads of time replying to these people, usually with lengthly posts addressing absolutely ever detail.
I don't come here to spend my time constructively, its recreation.
I've never claimed to know it all. But I do know more than most and so someone like yourself might not be able to tell the difference, as you're unable to probe the extent of my knowledge in areas where I specialise. Sure, you could find a recently published paper and say "Prove result 4" but that's not what I mean. In areas where I have experience there's no question a layperson can ask which I couldn't at least give some kind of answer to. This isn't me being arrogant, its what one should expect from having a broad education. Someone whose done a degree touches on a great many things on the way to the final exam, an education wouldn't be worth much if you didn't learn a thing or two. Hence any question a layperson might think up having read some science tit-bit I'm more likely to be familiar with the concepts and work than they, so I seem knowledgable in many things. Put me up against someone else whose done a degree (and particularly someone whose done a PhD) and they'll see how superficial my knowledge on many things is and I them.No, if alphanumeric was any kind of superior being, he would see his flaws for what they really are, knowing equally that acting like a know-it-all does him no justice.
Why are you so surprised that on a maths and physics forum someone whose done them for almost a decade actually knows something about them?
I've binned months of work in the past. I've pitched ideas during brain storming sessions at work which have been cringe-worthily daft. When I'm incorrect I'm happy to learn from it but I'm going to need a small amount of convincing. Someone who knows their stuff and says "You're wrong" to me can easily provide reasons, hence I'll listen to them. You don't know your stuff so not simply taking your word for it is hardly me saying "I am never wrong", I want you to present justified arguments. That is the hallmark of a good scientist too, reasoned arguments.A true scientist knows when to eat humble pie. And it is those kind of scientists who always win the public ear.
About 2 days ago I walked someone through how to compute half lives from measurements over in the main forum. It's clearly the guys high school homework but I didn't rip into him, I was polite. You used to think I was nice till you started posting your 'essays' and I pointed out all your mistakes.He does this with nearly anyone he feels cuts short of himself. He's shameful.
I'm confident about what I know and I'm not afraid to show it. If you didn't put yourself in the firing line by posting such pathetically obvious conglomerations of material lifted from other sources and sprinkled with your ignorance I'd have less reason to reply to you. You post crap, your errors are exposed, you complain, you then go post more crap.a over eager, stuck up know-it-all.
You remind me of a line from The Simpsons :
"...and the doctor said I wouldn't have so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there." - Ralph Wiggum.
Just like Ralph's problem would go away if he stopped acting stupid, so would yours.