Top American General is racist Anti-islam Bigot

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Proud_Syrian

Guest
A highly decorated general who is one of the leaders of a secretive new Pentagon unit formed to coordinate intelligence on terrorists and help hunt down Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and other high-profile targets has a history of outspoken and divisive views on religion — Islam in particular, NBC News has learned.


http://msnbc.com/news/980764.asp?0cv=CB10#BODY
 
Oh no, one general expressed an opinion!:eek:

Good thing that almost all Islamic/Arabic political and religious leadership don't say anything like that, especially about Jews and Christians. I would hate to think what the ME would be like without the level-headed leadership of Hassan, Arafat, House of Saud, etc.:rolleyes:
 
PS is complaining about biggots :eek:

what a predicament!
rotflmao


ghassan:
in the absence of any logical argumental "comeback" you call him "ignorant" ?
how "not ignorant" of you.:rolleyes:

these muslim fanatics should speak.
just check this week's speech by the Malaysian PM. Malaysia is the most modern and moderate Muslim country and that guy said some really stupid things. what he said isn't even considered "offensive" or "strong worded" in the muslim world. Israel's Arab allies seemed to agree and clap their hands at his speech...

but i'm sorry, only Muslim fanatics are allowed to be racist biggots.
i think muslims got used to the fact that westerners don't express themselves in such hateful ways as themselves so when a small remarks slips up they're crying rivers about racism and biggotism and some jewish conspiracies etc etc.
 
Originally posted by otheadp
ghassan:
in the absence of any logical argumental "comeback" you call him "ignorant" ?
how "not ignorant" of you.:rolleyes:
My ignorance can not coprehend the intentions of your challenging words of superiority , what argument am I supposed to make in respect to my remark directed at the cattle-speciment ?

Perhaps I needed to explain how those who he mentiones do not share the same views regarding those who would be victimized ?
 
Originally posted by otheadp
just check this week's speech by the Malaysian PM. Malaysia is the most modern and moderate Muslim country and that guy said some really stupid things. what he said isn't even considered "offensive" or "strong worded" in the muslim world.
Perhaps if you would not be born yesterday you would have noticed that this isnt realy news

I have to say that I disagree very much with his categorizing within religious perspective , as it serves only purpose to those who wish to point and cry anti-semitism , nor does it reflect reality , while it acknowledges the claims made by zionists over Judaism .
Israel's Arab allies seemed to agree and clap their hands at his speech...
Perhaps you should wonder weither you have any allies in the Arab world as a zionist state , other than Kapos .
think muslims got used to the fact that westerners don't express themselves in such hateful ways
I recognize the phenoma of the smiling and friendly murderer and rapist , it really doesnt change the results now does it ?
 
Huh?

My ignorance can not coprehend the intentions of your challenging words of superiority , what argument am I supposed to make in respect to my remark directed at the cattle-speciment ?

Can somebody translate that into english for me?
 
Ok, i will take a crack at it

What GasBagam was trying to say was:

"Because of my rank and criminal ingorance, I am completely unable to comprehend what you said. What argument can somebody of my limited intellectual capacity make to your statement? By the way, you are a cow."

Did I translate that correctly GasBagam?
 
It seems Lt. Gen. Boykin gave a slide-show of photos taken over Somalia some time back. On one of the aerial photos he refered to a black smudge as clear evidence of Satan's black mark of evil over the land (or some such rot).

A psychologist might relish the idea of sitting down with this guy over some ink-blots. I understand the General works in the Pentagon - just hope he isn't in charge of interpreting reconnaissance photos. :bugeye:

http://wso.williams.edu/~mhacker/Strangelove/endmusic.wav

Michael
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by Brad
saburn.gif
Rules

Did I translate that correctly
Not quite , cave-dweller , but we could not ecpect any different of you .
Originally posted by truth
Thanks for the translation, Brad, that is what I thought he was trying to say.
A miracle . Ofcourse I was not saying it to you nor your devil companion . For your convenience I shall repeat the point to be made : When you speka of a distinct issue as position against other religions you should not clump peoples from allover together as you did , regardless of their conservatism or their secularism . It makes you look like you have no idea what you are talking about , which obviously is the case .
 
The fact that other people around the world may be bigots too is not an issue here..
The fact is that the man responsible for coordinating the US military search for saddam and bin laden hates muslims and thinks that they're all doing the devils work. Now, if he wasn't in this particular role it would be correct to say that hes just expressing his opinion, but in this capacity it makes hiim very dangerous.
This is the kind of person who would wipe out whole towns if he thought one of his fugitives might be there(or even if the towns picture had a smudge on it)
 
Originally posted by jps
The fact that other people around the world may be bigots too is not an issue here..
The fact is that the man responsible for coordinating the US military search for saddam and bin laden hates muslims and thinks that they're all doing the devils work. Now, if he wasn't in this particular role it would be correct to say that hes just expressing his opinion, but in this capacity it makes hiim very dangerous.
This is the kind of person who would wipe out whole towns if he thought one of his fugitives might be there(or even if the towns picture had a smudge on it)

Well said....

When the Malaysian PM made some remarks regarding the jews ( and he was 100% right about his remarks ) the HYPOCRITE western states called the malaysian ambassadors in their states to PROTEST the malaysian PM remarks, but when TOP AMERICAN GENERAL make anti-Muslim hateful remarks, I dont see them calling the american ambassadors in their states to Protest !!!!

SICKING HYPOCRISY.
 
Originally posted by Proud_Syrian
and he was 100% right about his remarks

No he wasnt , and as I already said it is exactly what they desire to hear . By clumping all Jews together and let it be represented by the zionist entity , you do nothing but what zionists desire you to do . Moreover by assuming this Jewish identity you give them another pre-text for accusations of anti-semitism .

There are some 15 million peoples who consider themselves Jewish in some way , of whom the great majority has no influence whatsoever on anything .
 
I'm surprised by this guy's expression of his views. The higher ranking an officer you become, the less of a warrior you're allowed to be, and the more of a politician you have to become. That's one of the primary reasons I chose to resign my commission, actually.

I couldn't care less about this guy's religious views. What matters is that he's a performer in his profession. The better he does his job, the less danger the men in his command are put into. If one of the caveats is that he's a hard line Christian who has whatever vitriol toward Muslims, then so be it. And just so you know, I don't agree with his rhetoric.

What I don't like, is how outspoken he is. Somebody's not going to like what he is saying, and they're going to relegate him to some other post, depriving his command of a competent leader. He may then be replaced by somebody less than desireable.

Anyway, regardless of what kind of religious whackjob he is, what matters is how well he does his job. He needs to keep his mouth shut and stick to his day job, because it could get him fired.
Originally posted by Brad Rules
Can somebody translate that into english for me?
I think that means "I'm unable to fabricate a cogent argument, so I'll babble on in total cognitive surrender".

But I could be wrong.
 
Originally posted by Stokes Pennwalt
I think that means "I'm unable to fabricate a cogent argument, so I'll babble on in total cognitive surrender".

But I could be wrong.
Can you sink any deeper into ignorance Stokes ? The point has been made to truth , a sacrastic remark you and your cult here obviously didnt get whatsoever has been made to Ot , and you keep on squeezing stupidity out of it regardless of the those who did nothing but previous to you ? Do you not think it is just sad ?
 
A person's views do become a factor if they have the potential to interfere with their job, especially when, as in this case, its made clear that those views are used in making decisions and no attempt at objectivity has been made.
 
Boykin has got to go. Along with many others currently at the helm, who are running the US ship of state aground on a minefield.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top