You have not answered my question , again
Your response is full of measurements
Where is it that Nature is based on our ability to measure action movement ?
If we weren't here would all this action cease to happen ?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Time Travel is Science Fiction
- Thread starter Farsight
- Start date
You have not answered my question , again
Your response is full of measurements
Where is it that Nature is based on our ability to measure action movement ?
If we weren't here would all this action cease to happen ?
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
You have not answered my question , again
Your response is full of measurements
Where is it that Nature is based on our ability to measure action movement ?
At the start line of a 1/4 mile drag strip. The light turns green and you stomp on the pedal and increase velocity just as fast as you possibly can. So, to recap, 1320 feet, a car, and a timer.
Ever heard of a dyno?
At the start line of a 1/4 mile drag strip. The light turns green and you stomp on the pedal and increase velocity just as fast as you possibly can. So, to recap, 1320 feet, and a car, and a timer.
Ever heard of a dyno?
But if we didn't measure the time that the car went down any distance , would that effect the car performance , in any way ?
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
But if we didn't measure the time that the car went down any distance , would that effect the car performance , in any way ?
No. Duh?
Originally Posted by river
But if we didn't measure the time that the car went down any distance , would that effect the car performance , in any way ?
No. Duh?
Therefore time has no inherent efficacy
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
Therefore time has no inherent efficacy
What?
What?
Efficacy
Time has in and of its self no capacity or power to produce an effect on anything , by its self
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
Efficacy
Time has in and of its self no capacity or power to produce an effect on anything , by its self
Time is just a measure of duration. It's the duration between the point in time you lay your head on the pillow to the point in time you wake up.
Time is just a measure of duration. It's the duration between the point in time you lay your head on the pillow to the point in time you wake up.
Sure
But as I said , time has no efficacy and therefore duration has the same lack of efficacy , no difference
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
Sure
But as I said , time has no efficacy and therefore duration has the same lack of efficacy , no difference
No difference in what? Regardless of whether you timed it or not, you slept for 7 hours. No difference in what?
Originally Posted by river
Sure
But as I said , time has no efficacy and therefore duration has the same lack of efficacy , no difference
No difference in what? Regardless of whether you timed it or not, you slept for 7 hours. No difference in what?
Yes you slept as long as you did
Duration and time are the same thing , in that both are true but are not necessary for the action to happen at all
Take the liquidity of hydrogen
The colder the atom is taken down the more liquid state it becomes
Until the atom does become liquid , at about -270c or kelvin , if my memory serves me right
The point is , duration nor time is the reason that this hydrogen atom reached the point of liquidity
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
Duration and time are the same thing , in that both are true but are not necessary for the action to happen at all
Nothing happens in zero time. If it happened, it took time.
Take the liquidity of hydrogen
The colder the atom is taken down the more liquid state it becomes
Until the atom does become liquid , at about -270c or kelvin , if my memory serves me right
The point is , duration nor time is the reason that this hydrogen atom reached the point of liquidity
How much time did it take to cool the atom to -270c? Ooops, are we not considering that? The point is, I can explain cold and hot. I can tell you many many things, because I've had this theory worked out for several years. I've had time to think!
Nor does length. This is a really dumb argument you are making. It is completely meaningless.Efficacy
Time has in and of its self no capacity or power to produce an effect on anything , by its self
Originally Posted by river
Duration and time are the same thing , in that both are true but are not necessary for the action to happen at all
Nothing happens in zero time. If it happened, it took time.
But look deeper
Why did the hydrogen atom become liquid ?
Originally Posted by river
Efficacy
Time has in and of its self no capacity or power to produce an effect on anything , by its self
Nor does length. This is a really dumb argument you are making. It is completely meaningless.
Not really
Its just for some hard to understand , no insult intended to your intellect or any others
It took me many yrs. To put it altogether
But what I say is true
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
But look deeper
Why did the hydrogen atom become liquid ?
Because time elapsed.
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
You have no idea how weird the universe is!
Originally Posted by river
But look deeper
Why did the hydrogen atom become liquid ?
Because time elapsed.
No
Think of the effect of the cold on the atom itself
In all of its natural properties
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
No
Think of the effect of the cold on the atom itself
Ok, continue...
Ok, continue...
I'm not sure that I should
Are you open to thinking and discussing what I think , without insults and character attacks
If so I would glad to express my thinking
river