This Appeared in the Sky over Siberia

Compare and contrast Magical Realist's approach, for example, where he starts with the assumed explanation and works backwards to make that fit the facts.
Click to expand...

That's because I post only the most compelling and well-vetted cases of ufo encounters in history. These are the undebunked cases---confirmed as real physical craft by investigators and journalists and scientists far more skilled at debunking than you. So naturally I concur with their conclusions. That's what I'm presenting. The conclusive cases. It would be disengenous for me to pretend these things are of mundane origin when I've posted case after case proving them to be real otherworldly craft of unknown origins. UFOs are real James. And these cases I post prove it.
 
Magical Realist said:
These are the undebunked cases---confirmed as real physical craft by investigators and journalists and scientists far more skilled at debunking than you.
Click to expand...
Pardon me?

Which ones have been confirmed as real physical craft? Where can we find these real physical craft now?
 
Magical Realist said:
That's because I post only the most compelling and well-vetted cases of ufo encounters in history. These are the undebunked cases---confirmed as real physical craft by investigators and journalists and scientists far more skilled at debunking than you.
Click to expand...
Another falsehood.
What you mean is "undebunked as far as you are concerned" (e.g. the Mansfield case: Klass effectively debunked it, no one has "confirmed it as a "real physical craft").
 
Magical Realist said:
That's what I'm presenting. The conclusive cases. It would be disengenous for me to pretend these things are of mundane origin when I've posted case after case proving them to be real otherworldly craft of unknown origins. UFOs are real James. And these cases I post prove it.
Click to expand...
MR, can you clarify your use of '' otherworldly craft''. Do you mean off-world or not of nature?
 
Last edited:
sweetpea said:
MR, can you clarify your use of '' otherworldly craft''. Do you mean off-world or not of nature?
Click to expand...

In the most general sense, I mean non-human intelligence. This could be extraterrestial, interdimensional, time traveler, or even paranormal. Yes,,non-natural would be another way of saying it.
 
Yazata said:
...not long after sunset. (And you laughed at MR when he mentioned dimensional portals) My science-fiction fueled imagination likes to imagine there is some alien CERN at the other end of this, an alternate-reality high-energy physics experiment gone very awry.

45BA386A00000578-5023505-Pictured_is_the_spectacular_sight_over_northern_Siberia-a-68_1509099604575.jpg


Lots of weird things happen in Siberia. (Tunguska, the Denisovans...) Kind of like the southwestern desert here in the US with its Roswell and Area 51.

Yes, there's an official explanation for this Siberian apparition, but I'll leave it to our Sciforums wizards to discover what it is.
Click to expand...
Anybody heard about this?
 
magical-realist said:
That's what I'm presenting. The conclusive cases. It would be disengenous for me to pretend these things are of mundane origin when I've posted case after case proving them to be real otherworldly craft of unknown origins. UFOs are real James. And these cases I post prove it.
Click to expand...
My bold.
I asked you to clarify your use of '' otherworldly craft'' in the above quote.
You replied:
magical-realist said:
In the most general sense, I mean non-human intelligence. This could be extraterrestial, interdimensional, time traveler, or even paranormal. Yes,,non-natural would be another way of saying it.
Click to expand...
Can you say how you have proven the objects, you are calling ''craft'', are of ''inter-dimensional'' or ''time traveler'' in origin?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top