I guess I could call it Relativistic Inflation. Never thought I should give one my ideas a name. I think if one was to assume that only forms of energy existed without mass at the moment of the Big Bang, then Relativistic Inflation would be unavoidable, and most of my ideas about the Big Bang boils down to the start of the Big Bang consisting of pure energy without mass. The goal of the theory would be to show that it resembles normal inflation as closely as possible while explaining it as a relativistic effect. Sorry to say that, I think this is one thing that your theory is clearly lacking, resembling inflation. The Big Bang has been shown to be too perfect of an explosion, meaning that a normal explosion cannot have the degree of "smoothness" as the Big Bang. It has been described as too perfect of an explosion. If you compared it to being like air moving through a nozzle, a Big Bang Theorist would most likely throw out the idea immediatly. There would just be too much variation involved.Prof.Layman,
Thanks for your theory. Does it have a name? Mine's the 'Mable Theory', Mable being the Mother of All Black hoLEs, the black hole at the center of the Universe.
I think you have made the idea a lot clearer by saying that we are just being drawn to some sort of suppermassive black hole. There is another problem with this idea though. In Big Bang Theory, the universe itself is seen as a higher dimensional object. So then when you ask where did the Big Bang happen, where was the location of the explosion, the answer is it happened everywhere. Take for example a ballon, before you blow it up you take a pen and mark dots on it that represent different galaxies. Then when you blow up the ballon the dots move away from each other equally in all directions, given the ballon was perfectly round. So then the "explosion" happened everywhere on the ballon at once, and there is no location on the ballon that is more significant than any other location as to where this "explosion" took place. The two dimensional surface of the ballon stretched out into a higher third dimension.
From what we have learned about the Big Bang, it is just too complex to be able to describe it simply as caused by a large center of gravity. I am sure they would have come up with that idea already and thrown it out a long time ago. Also, a suppermassive black hole's gravitational effects are mostly only seen to affect the galaxy it is in. It would take a black hole so large it would be nothing like we have ever seen before, possibly larger than a galaxy itself.