If Americans are descended from European settlers, why do Europeans still exist?If we evolved from apes, than why are apes still around?
If Americans are descended from European settlers, why do Europeans still exist?If we evolved from apes, than why are apes still around?
Your linguistic faculty on abuses side is improving as you are growing old.No shit, Sherlock!
I have not read every Post to this Thread & apologize if the following is similar to some other Post.
From Bearer_of_Truth Post #8First: I think that Homo Sapiens & apes evolved from a common ancestor.
Second: I do not think it that our evolving from apes requires that apes cease to exist.
It seems possible that two populations of apes geographically separated could result in one group evolving into Homo Sapiens while the other group does not.
I wonder if there are any examples of evolutionary descendants & their predecessors co-existing.
If Americans are descended from European settlers, why do Europeans still exist?
And monkeys don't act like gorillas or chimpanzees. But all of us descended from the same ancestors.I do not know about your family. But I have seen photographs of some of my late ancestors and know from the way they look that they did not act like apes or monkeys.
And, back even farther, pond scum - single celled organisms.Where are the water creatures that we first supposedly had come from. Now, I am suppose to believe that I came from slimy fish as well?
It's a pretty straightforward belief. God created us.And I am not convinced that you know much about Creationism either.
If you go back far enough, yes*. Your beautiful children would not be here without the stars that created the elements that make up their bodies. No matter how hard you try, you cannot create a child without carbon or calcium. (In fact, it would be hard indeed to create one without iodine - and that comes only from supernovas, so you have those very big bangs to thank for your beautiful children.)Am I suppose to believe that a "Big Bang" is what created our beautiful children?
Yep. in the same way Mars, Main sequence stars, and the germ theory of disease are "just assumptions".Darwinism is just an assumption .
I'm afraid not, at least if you go by the Bible. Genesis 2 states quite clearly that Man came first, and then God created the rest of the animals. (Of course, other religions may differ.)In the beginning God created life . after he created different specie then He created man
We have a pretty good idea.What was or who was the common ancestor , we really don't know .
It's also an observation; we have seen evolution happen.Darwinism is just an assumption .
I have talked to God too.. and God is almighty so human must evolved from apesI have talked to angels, demons and the dead.
At least apes are smart enough not to be creationists.I do not know about your family. But I have seen photographs of some of my late ancestors and know from the way they look that they did not act like apes or monkeys.
I'm afraid not, at least if you go by the Bible. Genesis 2 states quite clearly that Man came first, and then God created the rest of the animals. (Of course, other religions may differ.)
We have a pretty good idea.
It's also an observation; we have seen evolution happen.
At least apes are smart enough not to be creationists.
Genesis # 1 If you want to be to pick for your argument . After God separated water into its own spots , He said let the grass and vegetation come from the ground , then come the sequence of living organisms and diversity. This is very clear written.
The most recent common ancestor between man and our nearest cousins (chimpanzees and bonobos) happened about 12 million years ago. It is often referred to as the CHCLA (chimpanzee-human last common ancestor) and has the provisional name of Pan Prior.Since you have a pretty good idea , why don't share > Tell me who is the real ancestor , do you have, have any skeleton or a sequenced DNA, At what period it hav taken place
Yes, they do. The various theories concerning evolution will be refined with time. There is pretty much zero chance that we will discover that the fundamentals (heritability of phenotype, mutation and natural selection) are incorrect.Darwinism is a theory that is commonly accepted . Theory change with time .
We've gone through this before but we will revisit it.
Genesis 2:
"This is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens, before any plant of the field was in the earth and before any herb of the field had grown. For the Lord God had not caused it to rain on the earth, and there was no man to till the ground; but a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground.
And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being."
So, per the Bible, the very first thing God did right after he created the Earth and the heavens was to make it rain (mist, actually.) The very next thing was the creation of Man, and the Bible is very careful to state that this happened BEFORE any plants had grown.
"The Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden, and there He put the man whom He had formed. And out of the ground the Lord God made every tree grow that is pleasant to the sight and good for food."
So plants came next. (Again, per the Bible, not me.)
"And the Lord God said, “It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable to him.” Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. And whatever Adam called each living creature, that was its name. So Adam gave names to all cattle, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. "
Animals came next.
"And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall on Adam, and he slept; and He took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh in its place. Then the rib which the Lord God had taken from man He made into a woman, and He brought her to the man."
And finally woman. So it's pretty clear - Earth, man, plants, animals, woman.
The most recent common ancestor between man and our nearest cousins (chimpanzees and bonobos) happened about 12 million years ago. It is often referred to as the CHCLA (chimpanzee-human last common ancestor) and has the provisional name of Pan Prior.
Yes, they do. The various theories concerning evolution will be refined with time. There is pretty much zero chance that we will discover that the fundamentals (heritability of phenotype, mutation and natural selection) are incorrect.
Um, what?Now, now, here comes an other invented name ( CHCLA ) to support the idea of our common ancestor. I wonder Is there or was any Human that went back to ape in the last 1000 years
They would if they understood the evidence.They also don't believe in the Big Bang , nor into dark energy nor dark matter.