///It appears that you are one who doesn't know it is.
What appears in your dreamworld is unrelated to reality.
<>
///It appears that you are one who doesn't know it is.
I was wondering would it be right to call The Vatican a theocracy?What would life in a theocracy be like?
Would everyone be compelled to go to church?
Would women be forced to dress differently?
Would TV news & newspapers be controlled?
Would everyone be forced to give 10% of their income to the state church?
Would there be no work on the Sabbath?
Would you be able to sell your daughters?
Would unruly children be stoned?
When police question you or ask for ID, would they check to see whether you have a bible with you?
Would divorce be illegal?
www.catholic.com/qa/is-the-vatican-really-a-countryIs the Vatican really a country?
Yes. The history of the Vatican City State is colorful, controversial, and complex. The world's smallest country, at just 109 acres, it has a population of roughly one thousand, with citizenship being largely restricted to those employed by the Vatican. It operates, among other things, a mint, a post office, an astronomical observatory, and a world-class radio station.
Being that religious practice is freedom of choice, I don't believe any of the above could be enforced. Perhaps some day religion will consolidate into a singular practice, which might be a good or bad thing.Is it possible for the USA to become a theocracy? Canada? England? Australia?
What would life in a theocracy be like?
Would everyone be compelled to go to church?
Would women be forced to dress differently?
Would TV news & newspapers be controlled?
Would everyone be forced to give 10% of their income to the state church?
Would there be no work on the Sabbath?
Would you be able to sell your daughters?
Would unruly children be stoned?
When police question you or ask for ID, would they check to see whether you have a bible with you?
Would divorce be illegal?
<>
Many of the above are enforced in many places in the world. We even enforce some of them right here in the US. Women are forced to wear tops; men are not. Government employees are generally not allowed to work on the Sabbath, or on many religious holidays. Fortunately we are improving there.Being that religious practice is freedom of choice, I don't believe any of the above could be enforced.
I'm not certain that women wearing tops is strictly religious dictate or a social norm. As for government employees, it's customary for government to shut down on weekends and holidays, but that doesn't prevent government employees from working elsewhere.Many of the above are enforced in many places in the world. We even enforce some of them right here in the US. Women are forced to wear tops; men are not. Government employees are generally not allowed to work on the Sabbath, or on many religious holidays. Fortunately we are improving there.
I'm not certain that women wearing tops is strictly religious dictate or a social norm.
It's both, of course. Many religious edicts (no work on Sunday) become social norms (government offices close on Sunday.) Religious mores require women to "cover up" more than men; the degree of this varies among religions.I'm not certain that women wearing tops is strictly religious dictate or a social norm.
Right; they just can't work at their primary job, because the government is enforcing a religious rule in places it can.As for government employees, it's customary for government to shut down on weekends and holidays, but that doesn't prevent government employees from working elsewhere.
I must admit, this is the first time I have heard of an atheist complaining they can't go to work on a Sunday.It's both, of course. Many religious edicts (no work on Sunday) become social norms (government offices close on Sunday.) Religious mores require women to "cover up" more than men; the degree of this varies among religions.
Right; they just can't work at their primary job, because the government is enforcing a religious rule in places it can.
I haven't seen any atheist complain that they can't go to work on a Sunday. To whom were you referring?I must admit, this is the first time I have heard of an atheist complaining they can't go to work on a Sunday.
If you are not complaining about having Sunday off, it doesn't look like it.I haven't seen any atheist complain that they can't go to work on a Sunday. To whom were you referring?
///If you are not complaining about having Sunday off, it doesn't look like it.
Your mindreading is a little off today. Perhaps if you reply to what I post, rather than to what you assume I am thinking, you would be able to reply more cogently.If you are not complaining about having Sunday off, it doesn't look like it.
So what is the atheist redress to the government enforcing the "religious rule" of not working on Sunday?Your mindreading is a little off today. Perhaps if you reply to what I post, rather than to what you assume I am thinking, you would be able to reply more cogently.
I don't know; I haven't heard of any. Have you?So what is the atheist redress to the government enforcing the "religious rule" of not working on Sunday?
Call it a secular holiday. And thank the labor movement for Saturday.So what is the atheist redress to the government enforcing the "religious rule" of not working on Sunday?
So if the current gov't wasn't so religiously inclined, people would work on sundays?I don't know; I haven't heard of any. Have you?
That was an example of government implementation of a religious rule, in response to a claim that that doesn't happen.
I guess the oppression of being prevented from working on a Sunday is perennial.Call it a secular holiday. And thank the labor movement for Saturday.
Yet no one seems in the least interested to solve it by working on Sunday ...Or that patriarchal religions and the need for a day off arise from the same source.