Theism vs. Atheism - Experience or Interpretation?

Is theism vs. atheism primarily a difference of interpretation or experience?

  • Theism and atheism are primarily different interpretations of similar experiences.

    Votes: 21 51.2%
  • Theism and atheism lead to very different experiences.

    Votes: 12 29.3%
  • Some other view.

    Votes: 8 19.5%

  • Total voters
    41
Thank you Sarkus, quite correct, indeed and good show. Roman simply ascribed traits of biology onto an invention because biological beings created it. Which is what I should have simply said in the first place.

Roman, your style led me to believe you were theist actually. Apologies :) ...but religion is still a lifeless invention.
 
samcdkey said:
So a dyslexic individual acquires dyslexia?

Dyslexia is a brain shortcoming preventing the acquisition of an invented language, not a language in and of itself.


samcdkey said:
Language is universal, the kind of language may be different but all humans everywhere can speak (see the analogy here?).

Why?

Correct, I said that. All languages are inventions hence not biological. The ability to invent language is an evolutionary trait.

Who is Bora Lee anyway?


samcdkey said:
I believe atheism is the dyslexia of religion ;)

Cute Sam, very cute :p
 
Back
Top