The Ultimate Religious Question

[IamJoseph]

But you know that in what is now considered the physical realm you have massless particles, energy fields, gravity and so on. Ephemeral stuff. There is no need to have a dualism, and yet this dualism is so attractive to some religions. And those religions tend to end up denigrating what is immanent. Which is sad.

Both are equally sacred - physicality and spirituality. Downgrading the former is an error. In fact, the physicality transcends at this time - we have to elevate the here and now for the higher.

Adam is not nature.

Nature represents majestic forces designed to process Creation. Yes, Adam was made by natural earthly particles + a mysterious 'X' factor, its metaphor being the breath of life. Adam was made from iodine, quarks, water and phospherous - nmely dust of the earth + an X factor. What else?

God you are judaocentric. Women had rights in cultures that had no contact with Judaism and the OT. And in many cultures women were the priests or among them. And God was a Goddess. Or God was both male and female. And this was made clear. Rather than being male and when pressured a few of the more mystical say God is actually both male and female.

The correct premises were affirmed, the incorrect not. While there is wisdom and rightiousness in all - there is also errors - and it is greater to correct and edit than copy. Try correcting MC2?

 

[Doreen]

Both are equally sacred - physicality and spirituality. Downgrading the former is an error. In fact, the physicality transcends at this time - we have to elevate the here and now for the higher.

I don't see why we need a dualism at all. There is what we experience. It turns out that experience, even of physical objects, is not really physical, in anything like the original sense of that term. There is no reason to split the world in two.

Nature represents majestic forces designed to process Creation. Yes, Adam was made by natural earthly particles + a mysterious 'X' factor, its metaphor being the breath of life. Adam was made from iodine, quarks, water and phospherous - nmely dust of the earth + an X factor. What else?

But he's not NATURE. At best he was a part of it.

The correct premises were affirmed, the incorrect not. While there is wisdom and rightiousness in all - there is also errors - and it is greater to correct and edit than copy. Try correcting MC2?

The modeling agency? mass times the speed of light squared?

 

[Light Travelling]

That fourth group is

I stand corrected. the fourth group is non religious.