CNBC: Squawk Box
In Gold We Trust
There is a serious credit contraction underway, I think [Yellen] should acknowledge that. I think she has to look at the capital base being wiped off the banks in this downdraft and equities: that's not supposed to be happening right now. They're supposed to be bulletproof, and oh, by the way, gold at $1,200 an ounce, what does that tell you? It tells you that in a flight to quality, in a safe haven, people have more confidence in gold than in bank deposits or paper money. I think things have gotten out of control."
-- Bob Michele of JPMorgan
That's bullshit Michael. Michele knows bank deposits are safer that gold and most investors, especially savvy investors, know that too. He is engaging in a bit of hyperbole, you know, the kind of stuff you do all the time. But this isn't about safety. It's about speculation. Some people are thinking the Fed will begin another round of quantitative easing and in doing so bring back the inflation speculators. Plus, there are folks who move to gold whenever there is global uncertainty. If deflation is the issue as many people fear, it will eventually affect gold prices as well. If safety were the issue, people would be moving into short term US Treasuries, and many people are doing just that. The flee to safety is manifested in the flight to short term Treasuries, not gold. Because gold is always a speculative investment.
--o--
O' Ye of little faith. The Central Banster Gawds know ALL. They know the value of my coffee
cup here in my hand, and they know the value of all money. So, Be Ye Goo'd State-bots, sacrifice your children's Labour at the alter of the T-Bond.... and perhaps their lives when the Public Psychopaths.... ah, Servants. Servants!!...send em' to die in a Glorious Banker funded Phony War against Aliens or something.....
LOL
Anyway, must be more of The Great Recovery from The Great "Recession"....
So, next stop is we elect a Socialistic POTUS, which probably won't work well given the whole checks and balances thing (remember, "Limited Givernment") and so he'll/she'll have to be blessed more "Executive' powers. Then said Dictator....errr POTUS can 'redistribute' for the Good of Society and in the same breadth return many of our Civil Liberties.
Lose-Win.
But, that's okay, because we'll all be materially better off, which is what really matters. Once we're used to a Dictator, errrr.... Executive / POTUS making all the rules, how about having one for live?
That sound good?
Maybe WWIII will change your mind?
This isn't about the so called "banksters". This is about a global economic slowdown brought about by China and an oversupply of oil and fears that oversupply will cause another banking crisis. The fear isn't in US banks but in European banks. US banks are much better capitalized and much better off that their European counterparts. There is a lot of commodity debt out their, not just oil, and that is causing some nervousness. The stock markets are pricing in a recession which may or may not occur.
At this point, the Fed doesn't see a recession on the horizon. I think, as I have said before, the Fed's rate hike in December was premature. But that's water under the bridge now. What matters is what happens next.
Thus far 64 percent of the 500 companies in the S&P 69% of them have earnings which have exceeded expectations, 11 percent have reported in line earnings and 20 percent have reported earnings below expectations. That's not bad especially when you consider the pain in the energy sector. Earnings for this quarter are down and moderately positive for non energy related stocks. That's the problem.
The economy is very complex. The global economy is very interdependent. Just because things are well in one place (e.g. the US), it doesn't mean external factors like China can adversely affect you.