Because it's a modest level of inflation. It causes no economic harm and it provides a buffer against deflation. It's a hedge against deflation.Why has the fed set the inflation target at 2%?
Because it's a modest level of inflation. It causes no economic harm and it provides a buffer against deflation. It's a hedge against deflation.Why has the fed set the inflation target at 2%?
Given this graph begins in 1947 (right before the US government started 'regulating' everything - for 'our' benefit/benefit of crony constituents) it looks even WORSE!
HA!Because it's a modest level of inflation. It causes no economic harm and it provides a buffer against deflation. It's a hedge against deflation.
It is irrelevant. What matters are where the data come from, not how many people have copypasted and commented them in the net.Where are Michael's charts? Where are the red labels?
Except none of that is true. The US government began regulating long before 1947. During WWII prices were fixed and food, materials, and supplies were regulated. The government issued ration cards. That's a some very serious regulation. And then there was The Great Depression where government introduced some significant regulation (e.g. Glass-Steagall otherwise known as the US Banking Act of 1933 and then their was the creation of The Federal Reserve, and anti-trust legislation ). So as usual Michael, you have your facts screwed up. The government began regulating long before 1947...oops.Given this graph begins in 1947 (right before the US government started 'regulating' everything - for 'our' benefit/benefit of crony constituents) it looks even WORSE!
Particularly when one factors in the massive gains in productivity. Which is why, I posted once before, an economists argument that minus the Fed-Bloatware glogging up the Economy/Hardware we'd see a medium income $350,000 in a free-market the USA. We'd probably not have started 3 more massive Phony Wars either (Korea, Vietnam, Middle East) or be living in a Police State (no, and not a virtual one either).
While I know it must be hard for some Americans to imagine we could, right now, have a medium income of $350,000 per person (which would allow for a huge amount of charity, that's already quite large), the same could be said about a $30,000 to a Chinese making $3000. I'm sure $30,000 sounds 'unrealistic' fantasy talk - particularly when you're just making ends me. The idea of tossing a perfectly good plastic bottle capable of carrying water in the ditch probably seems insane some someone in a small tribe where the medium income is $30 as well.
Bloomberg:You claim that chart was published by Bloomberg. If that is so why does your chart sourced from a specious Libertarian advocacy site rather than Bloomberg?
It would be good to see you use credible sources like Bloomberg going forward. Yes the middle classes and poor have not benefited as much as wealthy folks. That really hasn't every been an issue of contention. But your solution, your Libertarian solution, of giving the keys to the kingdom to the wealthiest citizens like your beloved Koch brothers will not solve the wealth inequality problems we face. Your solutions will not solve those problems.Bloomberg:
The Richest Americans Are Winning the Economic Recovery
Their incomes have fully recovered—and then some
- September 17, 2015
U.S. Census Bureau data out Wednesday underscore just how lousy the recovery has been if you aren't rich. Looking at eight groups of household income selected by Census, only those whose incomes are already high to begin with have seen improvement since 2006, the last full year of expansion before the recession. Households at the 95th and 90th percentiles had larger earnings through 2014, the latest year for which data are available.
Median household income is 6.5 percent lower than in 2007, the year the recession started.
Overall, median income was 53,657 in 2014, not a statistically significant difference on an inflation-adjusted basis from 2013's median of 54,462. It's the third straight year that there's been no significant change, after two consecutive years of annual declines. That's happened even though the labor market has posted steady progress. The number of men working full time and year-round in 2014 increased by 1.2 million from a year earlier while the number of women gained 1.6 million. The changes in their real median earnings, however, weren't statistically significant.
Meanwhile, the official poverty rate was 14.8 percent, with some 46.7 million people in poverty—both little changed from 2013. The rate is 2.3 percentage points higher than it was in 2007.
-o-
Don't worry Joe, I'm sure the Great Redistribution is coming. Who knows? Maybe even within your lifetime. If there's one thing American culture supports it's Limited Government, Freedom of Expression, Personal Freedom, Civil Liberties, Private Property Rights and the Right to Personal Privacy..... LOL.... Oh, I meant MOAR FREE, which requires: Unlimited Government Political Correctness, Taxing Laborer's by the hour, the right to be shot in the head for selling flowers without the State's permission, 100% surveillance and a total loss of personal privacy, and as for private property, you don't even own your own body. You're a Citizen of, property of, the USA; as evidenced by the fact you can not legally smoke a weed growing in your backyard, you pay a tax on your bodies actions, you cannot even marry without the State's permission.
Oh, and of course, Americans LOVE never ending phony wars. Poisoning women and children with Agent Orange; burning them with White Phosphorous or Napalm, polluting their homes with low level radioactive bullets, all while being the largest polluter on earth itself.
So, don't worry you fantasy may last your lifetime or perhaps we'll get ourselves a Caligula soon enough? I see Bernie and Trump's doing well in the polls. Imagine what the next two will look like.
Yeah, thing would have been so much better if we had no Fed and the nation's economy would have been allowed to become the Great Depression 2.0. NO, I don't think you are going to find many takers on that one Michael.A look back on predictions:
Predictions our 'Expert" University tenured (fat 6-figure) full Professors thought our Central Planners would do.
What WallStreet 'Economic Experts' predicted our Central Planners would do.
You know, taking in ALL of their combined wisdom and ALL of their "Economic Models" that were 'modelling' the... (in Joe's words) GREEEAT RECOVERY.
Isn't it wonderful being a Peon? Knowing the "Experts" have everything under control. Your retirement portfolio is safe in the hands of the "Experts". Although, one wonders.... just how do 'Experts' model the whims of a Tyrant? Or I should say our Central Banking "Regulators" (/Rulers /Financial Masters).
WSJ Survey: Economists Expect Fed Rate Liftoff in September
About 82% say first rate increase will be next month, while 13% expect central bank to wait until December.
- August 13, 2015
** NOTE: Referring to "Economics" as the Dismal Science does the word 'Science' a disservice. How about we use Dismal Flimflammary? Dismal Conartistry? When your so-called academic discipline has less chance of being correct than flipping a coin, then you know you're dealing with pseudoscience. We're not talking about predicting what the economy is going to look like in 50 years or even a decade. Not even the end of the year. We're talking a few weeks into the future. This supposed 'Science' that all these "Economic Scientists" are modeling can not even make a pissy 4 week prediction! That is pathetic. Utterly pathetic.
End The Fed
The middle class and the poor have NOT BENEFITED AT ALL.Yes the middle classes and poor have not benefited as much as wealthy folks.
If we did not have a Central Bank and Labor Tax, then there wouldn't have ever been a Great Depression 1 let alone 2. For example, we wouldn't be stuck using one currency, there'd be all sorts of different currencies. Some people would use a version of fiat, other's gold, others electronic and still other's would use types never invented. Most people would use a combination. This diversification would make it nearly impossible for one rouge institution (in this case, the Federal Government) to completely f*ck up society.Yeah, thing would have been so much better if we had no Fed and the nation's economy would have been allowed to become the Great Depression 2.0. NO, I don't think you are going to find many takers on that one Michael.
I swear to God you sound like you're 5 years old. The Koch brothers exist IN THIS WORLD. With THIS Federal Government. That's a FACT. They, like all the other billionaires were bailed out by the Central Bank.But your solution, your Libertarian solution, of giving the keys to the kingdom to the wealthiest citizens like your beloved Koch brothers will not solve the wealth inequality problems we face. Your solutions will not solve those problems.
It's not self-righteous, it's Ethics.What makes you so self-righteous? You have no idea if your ideas actually work.