Billy T, you ungrateful non-American! Have you no decency? Have you no respect for Ben Shalom Bernanke? Have you no respect for the money worshippers? Not even Boner?
For the father, nothing.
For the father, nothing.
I did not exonerate the Dems - I simply pointed out that they did not move left. The assertion, in your article there, that some kind of mutual and damaging polarization happened because both sides moved toward their supposed respective extremes, is completely false.Billy said:It was what I thought was wrong as you seem clearly to exonerate the Dems from any part of the growing budget / deficit problem, but it is hard to be sure what you are saying here:
That's not a simple observation.quadraphonics said:The polity has been - - - becoming more progressive (socially
I think your post is ironic sarcastic - that you are agreeing with me, but I am not sure as don't know understand the ref to Boner or the father.Billy T, you ungrateful non-American! Have you no decency? Have you no respect for Ben Shalom Bernanke? Have you no respect for the money worshippers? Not even Boner? For the father, nothing.
Recently, there has been much discussion about Barack Obama having possibly attended the recent Bilderberg conference in Virginia. This speculation arose when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton sneaked off for a secretive meeting while in Virginia. As the AP reported, "Reporters traveling with Obama sensed something might be happening between the pair when they arrived at Dulles International Airport after an event in Northern Virginia and Obama was not aboard the airplane. Asked at the time about the Illinois senator's whereabouts, [Obama spokesman Robert] Gibbs smiled and declined to comment."7
The press that had been traveling with Obama were not made aware of the secretive meeting until the plane that they assumed Obama would be present on was moving down the runway, prompting many angry questions from the press towards Obama’s spokesman, Robert Gibbs. One reported asked Gibbs, "Why were we not told about this meeting until we were on the plane, the doors were shut and the plane was about to taxi to take off?" to which he responded, "Senator Obama had a desire to do some meetings, others had a desire to meet with him tonight in a private way and that is what we are doing." This preceded another question, "Is there more than one meeting, is there more than one person with whom he is meeting?" Gibbs simply replied, "I am not going to get into all the details of the meeting." He again later repeated that, "There was a desire to do some meetings tonight, he was interested in doing them, others were interested in doing them, and to do them in a way that was private."8
On Friday, June 6, it was reported that Bilderberg tracker, Jim Tucker, "called Obama’s office today to ask if he had attended Bilderberg. A campaign spokeswoman refused to discuss the matter but would not deny that Obama had attended Bilderberg."9
I don't think Hillary is dumb enough to want to have GWB's depression happen when she is POTUS.I don't think he will seek a 2nd term as that was the terms of the "secret" deal with Hillary and the owners of the U.S when they decided Barack this time and Hillary next time. ...
According to a new poll conducted by Allstate and the National Journal most Americans believe that the U.S. economy has already been surpassed by China's economy. Only 20% of Americans polled believe that the United States has the strongest economy in the world, while nearly half say this distinction lies with China.
Despite this pessimistic view, one-third of Americans (34%) believe the United States will have the world's strongest economy 20 years from now, roughly in line with those who hold similar expectations of China's economy (37%). Respondents cited America's strengths in its higher education system (74%), science and research (66%), workforce (56%) and corporate leaders (57%).
For more information visit allstatenewsroom.com
According to a new poll conducted by Allstate and the National Journal most Americans believe that the U.S. economy has already been surpassed by China's economy. Only 20% of Americans polled believe that the United States has the strongest economy in the world, while nearly half say this distinction lies with China.
Despite this pessimistic view, one-third of Americans (34%) believe the United States will have the world's strongest economy 20 years from now, roughly in line with those who hold similar expectations of China's economy (37%). Respondents cited America's strengths in its higher education system (74%), science and research (66%), workforce (56%) and corporate leaders (57%).
For more information visit allstatenewsroom.com
Sorry if that POV is tiresome and hope your POV is correct, but strongly doubt it is. Instead I think most, as mentioned in post 44, suffer from the "normalcy bias" described here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias... The US certianly has troubles. But the bad news is very much overstated. The pessimism is very much over played at this point. And I am getting a little tired of it.
Sorry if that POV is tiresome and hope your POV is correct, but strongly doubt it is. Instead I think most, as mentioned in post 44, suffer from the "normalcy bias" described here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias
Even the heavens agree :
The full moon eclipse will start just after midnight Eastern Time on Tuesday,21 December 2010 with the main event starting at 1:30 a.m. ET and lasting until 5:30 a.m., when the moon reappears. This one is special (last one like it was 372 years ago) as it occurs on the shortest day of the year (for people in the Northern Hemisphere) and on longest daylight in the Southern Hemisphere. I.e. a full lunar eclipse & the solstice on the same day!
It seems to be an omen that dark days are here for the Developed World of the N. H. and bright days economically are ahead the developing world of the Southern Hemisphere.
Read more at: http://www.montrealgazette.com/life...+first+years/3983582/story.html#ixzz18mctHDtX
Although concerned at the humanistic level about 10% and chronic unemployment, positive things you listed are not my main economic concerns. It is the Debt to GDP ratio and the fact that at some point in time it will be to China's economic advantage to destroy the dollar, even with some cost to itself, if it has not already collapsed.... Despite our high unemployment rate, 90 percent of the work force is employed. Despite all of our economic problems, the nation income is still growing at a modest pace. And despite all of the clamor about inflation, the money supply remains relatively unchanged and inflation remains very tame. ...
Although concerned at the humanistic level about 10% and chronic unemployment, positive things you listed are not my main economic concerns. It is the Debt to GDP ratio and the fact that at some point in time it will be to China's economic advantage to destroy the dollar, even with some cost to itself, if it has not already collapsed.
I have twice now described the highly unusual reasons why Great Briton was, at the start of the industrial revolution, the only nation in history to survive a debt to GDP ratio over 90% which is where the US is (or very soon will be) now. Interest rates in the US are now rising, even the shorter term ones now, so the borrowing (increase in debt) will be faster now for four reasons than a couple of years ago:
(1) Federal & state deficits growing, not shrinking.
(2) Thus total owed is increasing.
(3) Cost of financing debt, interest, even per dollar owed, is increasing as interest rate rise.
(4) "Printing press" money is making up for more of the financing the above, especially as China grows increasingly resistant to lend more to US. (Actually lowered their dollar holdings by 100 billion in nine months ending July 2009 and probable are continuing to do so. Also China is spending reserves ASAP - The more than half a trillion order for 245 new nuclear plants will make a big drop in their reserves. Thus, it will hurt less when they decide to dump their US bonds to destroy the dollar for long term economic gains.
That too was when one country had almost all of the world working factories - far different than today's case when US's older than Chinese factories can't compete.... A more recent case of excessive debt to GDP would be in the post WWII era which was followed by a prolonged period historic economic expansion.
News flash for you: It has already so chosen.... the US still has the luxury of monetizing it's debt should it choose to do so.
Yes the Euro and Dollar will die together, but Yuan will be "better than gold" as it pays interest....The other thing that works to the advantage of the US is that most every other industrial country is in the same boat.
Well we disagree here. I am sticking with my long standing prediction that a run destroys the dollar by or before Halloween 2014. So from that POV what the tea party does or dosen't do is not very important. - I think GWB set the sad fate of the US during his years as POTUS....I think the biggest risk before the US now is political risk -the political risk presented by the emergence of the Tea Party. It remains to be seen if we will have the ability to make responsible economic decisions in the coming years ahead. It is a subject which is never far from my mind. Having blown off one foot, we could easily blow off the other. In the end, I don't believe that our fate is yet cast in die. Our future, in my opinion, is still ours to win or loose.
at some point in time it will be to China's economic advantage to destroy the dollar
China would and is. Also China is working hard to have little need or dependence upon the US. Why China is rapidly increasing the salaries of its population and decreasing their need to save for old age, sickness etc. - I.e. growing the domestic market to replace part of the exports to the US.That point in time will also include China lacking the ability to "destroy the dollar." The wonderful thing about economic interdependence is that one only gains leverage over another by accepting dependence on them. That's why this stuff works as a hedge on/alternative to warfare. We wouldn't do it, if it produced the same power dynamics as actual warfare.
No, not true. Economically it is a question of what pay back / recovery period China requires. I.e. the annual saving in the cost of it imports when the US and EU are not able to import these same items as competitors as they are in deep depression must exceed the loss of value on the dollars China still holds in it reserves. Spending more than half a trillion dollars from reserves to buy 245 new nuclear power plants, I think has moved that "Kill the dollar day" (for long term net gain) at least one year closer.So long as China has sufficient dollar reserves to pose a threat to the dollar, it will not be in China's interest to harm the dollar - quite the opposite. The day that China can afford to wipe out its foreign exchange reserves will be the same day that China doesn't have enough foreign exchange reserves to threaten the dollar.
That too was when one country had almost all of the world working factories - far different than today's case when US's older than Chinese factories can't compete.
News flash for you: It has already so chosen. Yes the Euro and Dollar will die together, but Yuan will be "better than gold" as it pays interest.
Well we disagree here. I am sticking with my long standing prediction that a run destroys the dollar by or before Halloween 2014. So from that POV what the tea party does or dosen't do is not very important. - I think GWB set the sad fate of the US during his years as POTUS.
A very valid concern as no fiat currency democracy ever has:... My concern is that the US may not be able to muster the economic will or domestic leadership to do the things that must be done. ...