Carcano
Valued Senior Member
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Petroleum_Fund_of_NorwayI don´t know about this. Do you have link or name of it so I can learn more?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Petroleum_Fund_of_NorwayI don´t know about this. Do you have link or name of it so I can learn more?
Thanks, but there is no indication there I could find that oil income is used for paying pensions to people retiring etc. There is some discussion that because oil income is so large compared to the number of Norwegians that perhaps (but not yet) some oil income should be used for government costs.
I.e. the Norwegian pension system is set up, just like the US Social Security system is - current workers, not the oil income, supports the retired.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pensions_in_Norway said:".. The State Pension is calculated according to what the individual has previously earned from ages 16 to 67. The calculation is made by The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV).
The financing of the state pensions is based on a "Pay as you go" system. This means that today's work force is making the payments for the current retirees..."
I don´t think that is the way most Norwegians look at it. Instead they think, God or nature gave Norway wealth as hydrocarbons and now the current generation is diversifying that wealth into many different assets (investments) and helping meet energy needs at lower cost for people all over the world. Most Norwegian, I think, would consider it immoral to use it for the current generation to live well with less work. The wealth belongs to all Norwegians, especially those not yet born, not to the current generation.Any way you look at it, oil is Norway's primary wealth creator.
If its officially called a PENSION fund its reasonably to assume that its being used to fund pensions. :bugeye:Thanks, but there is no indication there I could find that oil income is used for paying pensions to people retiring etc.
That would be your false assumption. It has had different names, but mainly is now called the "oil fund" by the people. From your link: " The fund changed name in January 2006 from its previous name The Petroleum Fund of Norway. The fund is commonly referred to as The Oil Fund (Norwegian: Oljefondet)."If its officially called a PENSION fund its reasonably to assume that its being used to fund pensions.
I don't disagree with you there. And why would anyone WANT to educate themselves when stealing from their neighbors is so much easier?Most people in US have little interest in the internet for self education
And what happens to Norway when their investments are "Nationalized" and "repatriated" to the country these investments are made in? What happens to Norway when a new "Patriot Tax X: A A Greed Tax on Greedy Rich Norsemen and their Greedy Corrupt Greedy Sovereignty Wealth Fund". We'll put the tax at 99%.Most of Norway´s oil revenue is NOT being spent on current consumption, but has been invested all over the world by an investment trust (660 Billion dollars now) for the future generations, when the oil is gone. You could say in the future, Noway´s oil made Norway rich in perhaps 2060 when it is used.
Well, to be Honoest WE used to share this culture. Asians in general still do.Yes Noway is different - a superior culture, not sealing from future generation for current consumption - because it educates well all its voters.
Is this as case of absence of evidence is not evidence of absence?Why do you BELIEVE Norway would be more prosperous in a free-market laze-fair economy when all that have been attempted (in small scale utopian groups) have failed, usually in less than a decade? That IMHO is just your quasi-religious dogma.
Under the current state of affairs, I agree. I'm simply making the argument it could (and some day will) be much better.BTW another interesting benefit of the Norwegian educational system, I did not mention, is that a new teacher typically will have smaller class by 2 to 4 students on average in her first cycle thru the system. An exceptionally good one may have 2 to 4 more than the average. - This is not government planning to help the inexperienced teacher cope. It is because everyone knows when a good teacher will retire and be replaced by one just out of teacher´s college. I.e. some women time, even several years in advance, the birth of their child to occur when an exceptional good teacher will be starting a new group in first grade!
This is actually a very serious point Michael makes here. Keynesian economists and politicians actually believe that the wealth of nations is driven by consumption.I heard an Americans saying how they 'deserve' more help 'from the Government'. I mean "we're doing all the shopping round here... keeping the economy afloat!!!"
Yes, and that is why usually a free market is better than a planned economy for satisfying "wants"The truth is that 'needs' always exist and 'wants' are infinite. What they both depend on for satisfaction is production...the great variable.
today I got more hard facts (not just from my memory):{post 242, in part}The fund is commonly referred to as The Oil Fund (Norwegian: Oljefondet)."
It is NOT used to pay pensions! Never has been, and is not likely to ever be used that way. Quite possibly it will some day build universities, hospitals etc. and not only in Norway! Norway, long before the oil was discovered has been one of the most generous givers to worthy causes on a per capita basis in the world. - For example, Norway payed for the construction of the UN security chambers and has lead many global efforts to reduce hunger, make peace, improve health, medical research, etc. Norwegians are not likely to think well of any suggestion that this natural wealth be used so they can live well with less work as it belongs to all Norwegian, especially those not yet born, if not to all mankind.
Again, I note the benefits of giving all voters a good education - Scandinavians don´t vote for politicians who promise "goodies for you now & big debts for the next generation" as US´s poorly educated masses do.http://www.investmentu.com/ (issue Number #1910) said:".. Norway is a weird sort of high-tax heaven.
High-income Norwegians pay nearly 50% of their income to the federal government, along with a substantial additional tax that works out to roughly 1% of their total net worth. And that’s just what they pay directly. Payroll taxes in Norway are double those in the United States. Sales taxes, at 25%, are roughly triple. Plus, the highest income tax rates kick in at $124,000. From there, the income tax rate, including a national insurance tax, is 47.8%. Then there’s the wealth tax, a 1.1% annual levy on the entirety of a person’s holdings above about $117,000, including stock in private companies held by the owner.
Try getting that package through the U.S. Senate Finance Committee.
The flip side of this politically toxic cocktail of taxes is that at age 67, workers get a government pension of up to 66% of their working income, and everyone gets free education, from nursery school through graduate school plus free high-quality day care for the asking. Wow.
An A+ in Fiscal Discipline:
Norway’s economy is not only driven by ample resources, as the rates of start-up creation here are among the highest in the developed world, and Norway has more entrepreneurs per capita than the United States. Economic growth is close to 4% and the unemployment rate is a rock bottom 3.1%.
The government gets an A+ in fiscal discipline, as it can only draw 4% of its $650-billion oil fund to support its annual budget, which probably makes Norway’s government balance sheet the best in the world. The management of this gigantic fund, up 4.7% in the third quarter. .."
You are probably thinking of something like Australia's 'Future Fund' made up from the sale of public assets.
It is currently being used to create a quasi governmented monopoly (after they sold the last one??) National Broadband Network that will be sold and used to pay for public service pensions, after the copper network is dismantled. Pity the bloody thing doesn't give broadband during a blackout and phone access dies when your backup batteries go. We've been sold a real pup on this one.
I personally would like to see less lord of the flies public schooling and more at home education. Resource wise, you're never going to get the sort of attention in a classroom that a tutor or your mother or father can give to you on a one-on-one bases. Not to mention that your parent will always have more invested in you getting a good education than some stranger.Poor education of the masses is at the root of all of the US´s problems. We need Federal funding of schools, higher taxes on the rich, so we could be more like any Scandinavian country. Norway is not, like all the other oil producers, using its oil wealth for just the current generation and is not significantly different from the other Scandinavian countries, which lack oil wealth.
The thing is, Scandinavian countries, are relatively homogeneous. Some have religious taxes (Germany does as an example). Germany has a great educational system. And their Chancellor recently called multiculturalism a failure. A few different Swedes I know have said Stockholm has turned into a violent crap-hole. A lot of Swedes now wish they hadn't taken in so many refugees.The bad news you´r standing by for is that US will never be as well run as Norway is because it is a country run by money for the benefit of of the rich, by their lobbyist and for their corporations, not "of the people, by the people and for the people." The rich, mainly thru their PACs, spent 6 Billion dollars to elect Congress they can control for their benefit in the recent election. Why the IRS code fills 73,000 pages, etc. Nothing will change until the people are as well educated as Scandinavians are. Most Americans are lambs easily lead by the TV ads as they cannot think for themselves.
The ring tone is low amperage AC and the voice part (analogue or digital) operates via 28-50v DC on copper ADSL etc (phone wires) fed by a bank of batteries at the exchange. One gave you a belt while the other was more like a wasp sting.By the way, do I understand correctly that in the USA there is NO power from the exchange even over the copper cable network all this time? Please someone correct me there if I recall incorrectly.
Glad to have helped but note that the rare earths are not rare - huge potentially commercial deposits are known. What is more rare about them is that the "EPAs" of few governments will permit them to be economically refined from the ores, which contain a lot of radioactive Thorium (if memory servers me correctly). Why the REs of Australia are shipped to some SW Asian country for processing.Just wanted to thank Billy - his advice has helped me build a fundamental nest egg using the precious metals and rare earth etfs.
I sort of feel sorry for Boehner. He´s between rock and hard place. If he gives in, the tea party and other right wingers who "took the pledge" (No tax increase) will bolt. If he does not agree to tax reductions for 98% of Americans, holding out for it to be 100% of all Americans and US plunges back into recession, that is the end of the Republican party in two years (Terrible defeat in next election almost certain.)http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-02/geithner-says-fiscal-cliff-deal-requires-tax-rate-increase.html said:“There’s not going to be an agreement without rates going up,” Geithner said in a taped interview that aired today on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Republicans will “own the responsibility for the damage” if they “force higher rates on virtually all Americans because they’re unwilling to let tax rates go up on 2 percent of Americans.”
“I would say we’re nowhere, period,” Boehner said on the “Fox News Sunday” program. “We’ve put a serious offer on the table by putting revenues up there to try to get this question resolved. But the White House has responded with virtually nothing.”
You´r not American, but as payment for the laughs we gave you, we will make you a non-resident one, and send you a tax bill. I´m an American but resident of Brazil and know that then it can be for a lot of bucks. - Thats bucks, not yucks. - you got them already. Where do you live? -We need to know where to send the bill.You lot in america should only care about who is going to give you more free mobile phones, lol.
Have they budgeted for the provision, to supply mobile phones to the whole world yet, lol
you mean the guy that wasn't a libertarian at all just your precious mises institute grasping at straws to validate an unscientific economic throery based on platitudes and wishful thinking rather than on anything resembling scientific methodology.Is this as case of absence of evidence is not evidence of absence?
I'll link a video except on the very first recorded Libertarian. You may have heard of him - he's quite famous.... In China