Can you tell me the harm in having certain social programs which benefit all citizens, like a military for common defense , a not-for-profit single payer Health Care for common health maintenance, Social Security for common financial security in old age, National commercial Infrastructure for common market access .
Do you really think a feudal system is better than a well run socio-economic system?
What was named "socialism" in Eastern Europe and USSR was a feudal system. I know from my own experience that it is bad, and that a capitalist system, even if only in a corporatist form (free market societies don't exist to compare with) are much better. Whatever you think about various social programs does not matter, if that New Green Deal starts, the US will be finished economically.
Care to revise that statement?
Why? The US is the most criminal, aggressive, murderous, evil state of the world. Ok, NK may be even worse for the local population, but it is not a danger for the world. The US is a great danger for the whole world. So, whatever weakens the US is good for mankind.
you seriously believe that Russia and China are not globalists?
That all this shite is really about globalists fighting to be King of the castle?
Yes, Russia and China are not globalists, their aim is not world rule. They don't have such a tradition. And this is natural for continental empires who have a lot of neighbors. If they would be aggressive, their neighbors would unite against them and they would have wars everywhere. For a large continental empire, with a lot of neighbors, it is much more reasonable to have peace and to react against attacks. In this case, those attacking neighbors will be alone, and the empire will be strong enough to win. It is winning in such wars what makes those empires greater. The situation for the US was different. They got a large territory and once the borders were secured (by genociding away the natives) they were able to start a much more aggressive imperial policy.
You can argue that the actual military situation is different. But so what, both rely on their traditions. They both don't have an ideology, but strong national imperial traditions, and this is the ideological base. And among the Chines traditions was the refusal to start trade with Europe thinking that they have everything they need, and have no interest in those Western luxuries or so. This was an error, it ended with collapse and Western world rule, and the Chinese have understood this. So, they will care about the world outside and they will trade. But they remain Chinese, with no interest to make the whole world Chinese.
