After disposing of some lies about me, I see the following:
Jonah Goldberg is a paid shill for the very people you claim to deplore and oppose. Everything he writes or says is propaganda, all of it is falsehood or bs, none of it is information. He's a standing joke among serious intellectuals of all political leanings.
Jonah Goldberg is, nonetheless, somebody who supports his propaganda with arguments, quotes and so on. You don't. And that you use the same defamatory language against him as against me tells me that there is nothing behind your attacks.
Trump is continuing and expanding the longstanding Republican policy of regime change via CIA violence and military coercion and black ops on top of economic sanction, without diplomacy and in violation of international law - Venezuela, most recently. He has been doing that since his first day in office. That is exactly what was predicted of him by informed observers.
Information. Take it or leave it. If you doubt it, check it.
And, as was also predicted, by other sources, and what I have seen already a year ago, he is continuing to destroy the US world rule in ways which cannot be recovered even if the next president will be an Obama-type globalist.
Found today a nice article which supports my position about Trump:
https://michael-hudson.com/2019/02/trumps-brilliant-strategy-to-dismember-u-s-dollar-hegemony/ writes
The end of America’s unchallenged global economic dominance has arrived sooner than expected, thanks to the very same Neocons who gave the world the Iraq, Syria and the dirty wars in Latin America. Just as the Vietnam War drove the United States off gold by 1971, its sponsorship and funding of violent regime change wars against Venezuela and Syria – and threatening other countries with sanctions if they do not join this crusade – is now driving European and other nations to create their alternative financial institutions.
No left-wing party, no socialist, anarchist or foreign nationalist leader anywhere in the world could have achieved what he is doing to break up the American Empire. The Deep State is reacting with shock at how this right-wing real estate grifter has been able to drive other countries to defend themselves by dismantling the U.S.-centered world order.
By the way, he also mentions "isolationism" in relation to Trump:
Trump’s agenda may really be to break up the American Empire, using the old Uncle Sucker isolationist rhetoric of half a century ago. He certainly is going for the Empire’s most vital organs.
and also sees that Trump is reaching the results by overplaying:
The U.S. overplaying its position is leading to the Mackinder-Kissinger-Brzezinski Eurasian nightmare that I mentioned above. In addition to driving Russia and China together, U.S. diplomacy is adding Europe to the heartland, independent of U.S. ability to bully into the state of dependency toward which American diplomacy has aimed to achieve since 1945.
The summary is quite nice:
Where is the left in all this? That is the question with which I opened this article. How remarkable it is that it is only right-wing parties, Alternative for Deutschland (AFD), or Marine le Pen’s French nationalists and those of other countries that are opposing NATO militarization and seeking to revive trade and economic links with the rest of Eurasia.The end of our monetary imperialism, about which I first wrote in 1972 in Super Imperialism, stuns even an informed observer like me. It took a colossal level of arrogance, short-sightedness and lawlessness to hasten its decline — something that only crazed Neocons like John Bolton, Elliot Abrams and Mike Pompeo could deliver for Donald Trump.
What is Trump's game in Venezuela is not yet completely clear to me, but it looks similarly like an overplaying, as in NK and Iran. The development around NK looks fine, the locals (SK, China, Russia) negotiate with NK essentially without the US disturbing them that much. In Iran, Trump has successfully discredited the opposition by openly supporting it. And it looks this works in Venezuela too: There is enough hate against the gringos and a strong enough army prepared for partisan warfare that an open attack by the US army will be too dangerous, at least this is what some observers think about it. The public support of the opposition seems not that strong as presented, and mainly comes from the rich. To start a partisan war from Columbia seems a plausible possibility, but Colombia is happy that its own civil war is more or less finished, and it is quite obvious that supporting such US games would endanger peace in Colombia itself. Not that the US would care, but those in power in Colombia care, and may prefer not to allow this. So, all this already looks like an overplayed game, and if Trump follows what he has done before, the coup ends in failure. (It looks like the only chance of the US is a coup by the military, given that the US would pay them a lot of money for a coup, and there are enough US-influences people in every Latin American army. But if the army remains behind Maduro, then I see a good chance that this ends with nothing.)
After this, the opposition in Venezuela is as discredited as the Iranian, by the open support by Trump. And, moreover, all those European politicians which have cooperated have discredited themselves in their countries too, by supporting open US regime change operations without any legal base. Add the open robbery of Venezuela's gold by GB, which discredits London as a financial market even without the Brexit.