In fact after reading your thread I come to realize that you too would be won over by a simple picture being presented to you...If i were to sign on as a different nickname and present fake photos of ufo's circling around the globe you people would probably believe in it. But that is the point! I will not believe in something because of photo graphs. Today's technologies have made it so a 2 year old can make a convinving picture out of nothing. Yes we need more evidence that a Picture. We are not gullible fools like you, I'm sorry
You ask questions, and answer it yourself. Then why ask the question? Look at all these assumptions you've made:
I think it's the other way around... too many people on this branch of the forums are too willing to believe everything that is presented to them. One little picture will win them over into believing what you want them to believe...
In fact after reading your thread I come to realize that you too would be won over by a simple picture being presented to you...If i were to sign on as a different nickname and present fake photos of ufo's circling around the globe you people would probably believe in it.
But that is the point! I will not believe in something because of photo graphs. Today's technologies have made it so a 2 year old can make a convinving picture out of nothing. Yes we need more evidence that a Picture. We are not gullible fools like you, I'm sorry.
I am sorry to make you look stupid, but I honestly, would not, be convinced with one picture. In fact, there is thread here, with pictures of alleged aliens. If you see my responses in it, you will see how I severely debunk it, and rejected it outright, despite how others were praising how convincing it was.
If you have paid attention, I have said in my thread, how Bob Lazar testimomy itself the guy who claimed to work in Area 51, with crashed flying sauchers, , is not enough to convince me, and how I do not support his story.
What's even funnier, I have not produced one picture of a UFO as evidence, despite having access to them, and even knowing some UFO photos are unexplained.
More importantly so, have you seen me once, talk about crop circles? Crop circles is now days synonymous with UFO', and there is so many speculative theories, proposed by mathmaticans to suggest, they are extraordinary. If I was so gullible, I would have mentioned them. You know why I have not mentioned them, because I am not gullible at all, and I of extreme analytical nature, and have no reason to believe they are of ETI origin. In fact, in another forum, I severely debunked the Milky hill 6 arm design crop circle, that is praised for its sophisticated design.
Have you seen me quote from fanatical UFO web sites, like Zetatalk, or the ones that list the various aliens? In fact, the first post I made on this web site, was to ask people to debunk the story of the nuclear war story, that I, did not believe in.
What do you know about me and my beliefs, to accuse me of being gullible. Dude, I do not believe in God, any religion, the soul, ghosts, demons, time-travel. Not very gullible, eh
I am a very rational, unbiased, and analytical type of person. I never believe blindly, I always demand proof. I started not believing in ETI and aliens, but unlike you "skeptic" in-the-box-thinkers, I did not deny the evidence, I read into it, and I found mountains of it, I found merit in them, and in some I didn't, I proceeded to analyse the evidence, and I became more and more convinced. Now I am completely convinced. I can say it without any hesitation whatsoever, that ETI exists, and they are visiting us.
I think you owe me an apology. If anyone is a true skeptic out of, me and the others who abuse that term here, that's me. As I said, the so called skeptics here, are not skeptics, they're fanatics - in skeptics clothing.