Ok I posted this at philosophyforums.com, but thought I would post it on here to get a different take on it. This one is mainly aimed towards my fellow atheists:
How do you argue/explain the prophecies of Jesus? I understand that some he did predict didnt come true, (the time span of his ressurection and seeing the kingdom of god come with power during his generation) but Ive also heard of prophecies that did come true. Such as the following:
"The fourth angel poured his bowl on the sun, and it was allowed to scorch people with fire" (Revelation 16:8)
"The sixth angel poured his bowl on the great river Euphrates, and its water was dried up in order to prepare the way for the kings from the east." (Revelation 16:12)
These talk of the drought in Africa, which to my knowledge has come true. But do these prophecies require one to twist words and such much like people do with nostradomus's prophecies? Are they otherwise explanable? Thanks.
How do you argue/explain the prophecies of Jesus? I understand that some he did predict didnt come true, (the time span of his ressurection and seeing the kingdom of god come with power during his generation) but Ive also heard of prophecies that did come true. Such as the following:
"The fourth angel poured his bowl on the sun, and it was allowed to scorch people with fire" (Revelation 16:8)
"The sixth angel poured his bowl on the great river Euphrates, and its water was dried up in order to prepare the way for the kings from the east." (Revelation 16:12)
These talk of the drought in Africa, which to my knowledge has come true. But do these prophecies require one to twist words and such much like people do with nostradomus's prophecies? Are they otherwise explanable? Thanks.