WillNever
Valued Senior Member
Done and done. Have you anything contributive..?Are they? Who says? This is a place of science. So, if you don’t back up that statement with an academic scientific reference within the next 24 hours then this is getting locked and Cesspooled.
I don't agree. It were an excellent response. Trying to draw false parallels between my meaning of the word and the religious connotations of the word has no place in this scientific forum. Neither does projecting your own value-laden interpretation onto what was a question for others, not a statement: "to me, this reads like you think gay people deserve criticism for their lascivious lifestyles."JamesR said:Bad response. What you could have done is to acknowledge your errors and move on. Instead, you choose not to face or take responsibility for your mistakes. You'll never progress that way.
Then you need help reading. If I "thought" that, I would have said so -- not ask if others thought so, and since you're well on your way to popping a blood vessel over this, I'll just let you know that the word has already been re-qualified in the original post, edited purely for your sake. For that reason, henceforth any further misinterpetive complaints about that statement are invalid. Enjoy.
Last edited: