The Impeachment of President Trump

I've already been given a warning in this thread.

Perhaps you don't like truth.
You are correct on that one. But not for the reasons you intend.
If I went around blindly accepting truth I would have nothing for my imagination to blissfully run off to.

And if I focus on all "truth and lies" a vast swell of unease pervades.
 
You are correct on that one. But not for the reasons you intend.
If I went around blindly accepting truth I would have nothing for my imagination to blissfully run off to.

And if I focus on all "truth and lies" a vast swell of unease pervades.
Does anyone actually agree with that?
 
Then, by all means, use the article to not only show the summary was wrong, but also show you were right. You've done neither, all I see from you is denial and innuendo.
Q:
Why are we having this correspondence?
You read the article that you posted.
You know that the sentence I questioned: "The proceedings unfold in the form of a trial, with each side having the right to call witnesses and perform cross-examinations. ..."
is not in nor from that article.
We both know that it is a fabrication.
SO
Why are we having this idiotic conversation?
What is it that you hope to get out of it?
 
Q:
Why are we having this correspondence?
You read the article that you posted.
You know that the sentence I questioned: "The proceedings unfold in the form of a trial, with each side having the right to call witnesses and perform cross-examinations. ..."
is not in nor from that article.
We both know that it is a fabrication.
SO
Why are we having this idiotic conversation?
What is it that you hope to get out of it?

Is this a joke or something? You do know what a summary is, right?

Summary - a brief statement or account of the main points of something.

Hopefully, you can figure out the rest, but somehow I doubt it.
 
Is this a joke or something? You do know what a summary is, right?

Summary - a brief statement or account of the main points of something.

Hopefully, you can figure out the rest, but somehow I doubt it.

One expects a summery from any educated and moral person would be derived from the subject material.
This "summary" does not meet that requirement.
The sentence in question was wholly made up from the summarizer's prejudice.
One does not summarize the crimean war by claiming a connection to the sinking of the titanic.
 
One expects a summery from any educated and moral person would be derived from the subject material.
This "summary" does not meet that requirement.
The sentence in question was wholly made up from the summarizer's prejudice.
One does not summarize the crimean war by claiming a connection to the sinking of the titanic.

Again, I have to ask if this is some kind of joke? Or, is denial your forte on discussion forums? Or, you still haven't read the article?

If you have read it, I can only conclude your reading comprehension skills are seriously lacking. Sorry, can't help you with that problem.
 
You are correct on that one. But not for the reasons you intend.
If I went around blindly accepting truth I would have nothing for my imagination to blissfully run off to.
Then don't accept it blindly. Open your eyes - and then accept truth.
 
News breaking here:
US president trump has been acquitted on both articles. 8.33 am - 6th.Feb.2020
It will be interesting to see how Trumps behavior reflects his impunity to impeachment.

USA is now officially a fascist nation. Let the tyranny begin!
 
Again, I have to ask if this is some kind of joke? Or, is denial your forte on discussion forums? Or, you still haven't read the article?

If you have read it, I can only conclude your reading comprehension skills are seriously lacking. Sorry, can't help you with that problem.
lol
 
News breaking here:
US president trump has been acquitted on both articles. 8.33 am - 6th.Feb.2020
It will be interesting to see how Trumps behavior reflects his impunity to impeachment.

USA is now officially a fascist nation. Let the tyranny begin!

Heil Trumpler!
 
I have a whole new respect for Mitt Romney. He da man with a conscience.
 
I have a whole new respect for Mitt Romney. He da man with a conscience.
he made history. it was apparently the first time a member of the impeached presidents party voted to convict. given trumps hard on for vengence and the complete spinelessness of the gop the extent of his courage cannot be understated.
 
he made history. it was apparently the first time a member of the impeached presidents party voted to convict. given trumps hard on for vengence and the complete spinelessness of the gop the extent of his courage cannot be understated.
He's playing a bet that Trump will fall on his sword, embarrass all those who supported him and the Repubs will need a solid candidate to run for president I reckon...
Looks like a smart move... he knew that Trump would be acquitted but also knows that Trump can't help himself when it comes to scandal...and will probably face another impeachment trial...
 
Back
Top